By or on behalf of: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
For if you fear your counterparty may try to make the point that, while it indeed received the [[fruits of the contract|fruits of the agreement]] it made with you, and therefore got what it wanted, it didn’t receive them ''directly from you'' — that by carrying out your promise, at your own cost, through the offices of an [[agent]], [[employee]] or other [[fiduciary]] [[representative]] of your mortal coil — by merely ''procuring'' performance and not performing in person — you have somehow ''wronged'' your counterparty,<ref>The exception that proves the rule is the personal appearance of a celebrity, which one cannot, as a matter of logic, do through an [[agent]] anyway.</ref> then your main concern should not be imprecision in your [[Mediocre lawyer|counsel]]’s drafting, but why on earth you’re entering legal relations with such a goose in the first place.
For if you fear your counterparty may try to make the point that, while it indeed received the [[fruits of the contract|fruits of the agreement]] it made with you, and therefore got what it wanted, it didn’t receive them ''directly from you'' — that by carrying out your promise, at your own cost, through the offices of an [[agent]], [[employee]] or other [[fiduciary]] [[representative]] of your mortal coil — by merely ''procuring'' performance and not performing in person — you have somehow ''wronged'' your counterparty,<ref>The exception that proves the rule is the personal appearance of a celebrity, which one cannot, as a matter of logic, do through an [[agent]] anyway.</ref> then your main concern should not be imprecision in your [[Mediocre lawyer|counsel]]’s drafting, but why on earth you’re entering legal relations with such a goose in the first place.


It is a principle of [[equity]], of business, of ''common flipping sense'' that one should ''[[nolli mentula esse]]''.
It is a principle of [[equity]], of business, of ''common flipping sense'' that one should ''[[don’t be that guy|not be that guy]]''.


But — as we have rehearsed so many times — to a [[legal eagle]], the magical realm of commercial probity is a foreign country. It is an inhospitable — even hostile place. If a [[legal eagle]] ever has to overfly it, she does so with apprehension, maintains altitude and scrams at the first opportunity, for fear she might be shot down.
But — as we have rehearsed so many times — to a [[legal eagle]], the realm of commercial probity is a foreign country. It is an inhospitable — even hostile place. If a [[legal eagle]] ever has to overfly it, she does so with apprehension, maintains altitude and scrams at the first opportunity, for fear she might be shot down.


When allied bombers returned from sorties over Europe, it is said, they sustained flak damage unevenly: some areas were shot at a lot, others far less. Engineers suggested focusing the armour where the planes sustained the most damage. The statistician Abraham Wald pointed out the [[survivor bias]] problem: the only planes you see are the ones that came back: where they got hit was the places it mattered ''least''.  
When allied bombers returned from sorties over Europe, it is said, they sustained flak damage unevenly: some areas were shot at a lot, others far less. Engineers suggested focusing the armour where the planes sustained the most damage. The statistician Abraham Wald pointed out the [[survivor bias]] problem: the only planes you see are the ones that came back: where they got hit was the places it mattered ''least''.  

Navigation menu