81,912
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The {{nyvmcsa}} tracks the {{vmcsa}} closely with two curious exceptions: Firstly, when imagining its [[hypothetical]] termination of all {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s it doesn’t explicitly carve out the {{isdaprov|Transaction}} constituted by the {{nyvmcsa}} itself — which is odd, because if you were treating it as a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} to be hypothetically included, you necessarily get a value of zero, since its value should be the exact negative of whatever the net mark-to-market value of all the other {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s are — and secondly it does not [[Hypothetical|hypothetically]] suppose that the {{nyvmcsaprov|Secured Party}} is the {{isdaprov|Unaffected Party}}, thereby getting to be in the driver’s seat when constructing the necessary valuations. | The {{nyvmcsa}} tracks the {{vmcsa}} closely with two curious exceptions: Firstly, when imagining its [[hypothetical]] termination of all {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s it doesn’t explicitly carve out the {{isdaprov|Transaction}} constituted by the {{nyvmcsa}} itself — which is odd, because if you were treating it as a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} to be hypothetically included, you necessarily get a value of zero, since its value should be the exact negative of whatever the net mark-to-market value of all the other {{isdaprov|Transaction}}s are — and secondly it does not [[Hypothetical|hypothetically]] suppose that the {{nyvmcsaprov|Secured Party}} is the {{isdaprov|Unaffected Party}}, thereby getting to be in the driver’s seat when constructing the necessary valuations. | ||
The reason | The reason you don’t have to except a {{nyvmcsa}} from hypothetical termination is buried deep in its earthen [[Ontology|ontological]] root system. Are you ready? | ||
{{csa transaction versus credit support document}} | {{csa transaction versus credit support document}} |