Template:Gmsla 11.7 comp: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


'''But see also Clause {{{{{1}}}|15}}, where this throwaway reference really bites.'''
'''But see also Clause {{{{{1}}}|15}}, where this throwaway reference really bites.'''
The 2000 GMSLA was slightly more dependent on LIBOR than its 2010 successor as can be seen in this {{diff|55633|57300}}. Changes are largely improvements: the 2010 assumes the parties will agree something else, relying on [[LIBOR]] only as a fallback (prescient in 2010!); it falls back to overnight and not one-month LIBOR (given the callable nature of stock loans that makes a lot more sense), and the 2000 version had a genuinely gruesome 44-line coda which seemed to be some sort of half-hearted attempt at linear interpolation for shorter periods which the 2010 version, by relying on the overnight rate, was able to jettison entirely with no great loss.

Navigation menu