82,796
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|g| | {{a|g| | ||
[[File:Tippex on screen.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Getting rid of those carriage returns one stroke at a time]] | [[File:Tippex on screen.jpg|450px|thumb|center|Getting rid of those carriage returns one stroke at a time]] | ||
}}Word processing {{tag|software}} that never quite managed to sort out auto-paragraph numbering but nonetheless sweeps all other office word-processing software before it. | }}{{Track changes is the thief of joy. | ||
:—Theodore Roosevelt}}Word processing {{tag|software}} that never quite managed to sort out auto-paragraph numbering but nonetheless sweeps all other office word-processing software before it. | |||
Refuseniks may prefer [[Microsoft PowerPoint]] (if trained in [[middle management]]) or even [[Microsoft Excel]] (if accountancy) as a canvass for composing documents. But the days of purpose-built alternative word-processing software packages, like Lotus Notes or WordPerfect or even the admirable but, preternaturally doomed open-source application OpenOffice are long gone. Google Docs might survive, but only because it purports to fill a very different need. And, Google. | Refuseniks may prefer [[Microsoft PowerPoint]] (if trained in [[middle management]]) or even [[Microsoft Excel]] (if accountancy) as a canvass for composing documents. But the days of purpose-built alternative word-processing software packages, like Lotus Notes or WordPerfect or even the admirable but, preternaturally doomed open-source application OpenOffice are long gone. Google Docs might survive, but only because it purports to fill a very different need. And, Google. |