A Manual of Style For the Drafting of Contracts: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
Mr. Adams has able, if [[tedious]], views on the appropriateness of the word “[[shall]]” in contractual drafting, and can refute all seven possible justifications for a [[successors and assigns]] clause. In a scrape — at any rate, one whose outcome depended on who had the better command of [[pedantry]] — here is a man you would be glad to have in your corner. Whether he wants to be there or not, we claim him for ours.
Mr. Adams has able, if [[tedious]], views on the appropriateness of the word “[[shall]]” in contractual drafting, and can refute all seven possible justifications for a [[successors and assigns]] clause. In a scrape — at any rate, one whose outcome depended on who had the better command of [[pedantry]] — here is a man you would be glad to have in your corner. Whether he wants to be there or not, we claim him for ours.


Well, we ''did'', until {{plainlink|https://www.adamsdrafting.com/onenda-is-mediocrenda-thoughts-on-a-proposed-standard-nondisclosure-agreement/|this unseemly outburst}} on the [[OneNDA]].
Well, we ''did'', until {{plainlink|https://www.adamsdrafting.com/onenda-is-mediocrenda-thoughts-on-a-proposed-standard-nondisclosure-agreement/|this unseemly outburst}} on the [[OneNDA]]. Onto the naughty step you go, Mr. Adams!


{{sa}}
{{sa}}

Navigation menu