82,903
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Mr. Adams has able, if [[tedious]], views on the appropriateness of the word “[[shall]]” in contractual drafting, and can refute all seven possible justifications for a [[successors and assigns]] clause. In a scrape — at any rate, one whose outcome depended on who had the better command of [[pedantry]] — here is a man you would be glad to have in your corner. Whether he wants to be there or not, we claim him for ours. | Mr. Adams has able, if [[tedious]], views on the appropriateness of the word “[[shall]]” in contractual drafting, and can refute all seven possible justifications for a [[successors and assigns]] clause. In a scrape — at any rate, one whose outcome depended on who had the better command of [[pedantry]] — here is a man you would be glad to have in your corner. Whether he wants to be there or not, we claim him for ours. | ||
Well, we ''did'', until {{plainlink|https://www.adamsdrafting.com/onenda-is-mediocrenda-thoughts-on-a-proposed-standard-nondisclosure-agreement/|this unseemly outburst}} on the [[OneNDA]]. | Well, we ''did'', until {{plainlink|https://www.adamsdrafting.com/onenda-is-mediocrenda-thoughts-on-a-proposed-standard-nondisclosure-agreement/|this unseemly outburst}} on the [[OneNDA]]. Onto the naughty step you go, Mr. Adams! | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} |