Change paradox: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:
So the idea of current management changing the very machine that has contrived to put them in the place where they can do that presents a variation of the [[time traveller’s paradox]]: If I change this, do I kick away the very ladder I climbed to reach the cockpit? If I fiddle in this way with the geometry of corporate space time, might I not disprove my very being?  
So the idea of current management changing the very machine that has contrived to put them in the place where they can do that presents a variation of the [[time traveller’s paradox]]: If I change this, do I kick away the very ladder I climbed to reach the cockpit? If I fiddle in this way with the geometry of corporate space time, might I not disprove my very being?  


No employee survey, no well-being outreach, no human resources questionnaire in history has been designed to prove out the point that the executive suite is populated by a bunch of glad-handing dilettantes, that the upper layers of senior management add no value and stunt the organisation’s forward progress, much less that human resources is in itself a pernicious waste of space. I dare say it would be rather fun if someone were to try.
Thus, management has derived some kind of prime directive: “I must change. For it is what leaders do. But whatever change I make, I must make it, without —” well, er — it is difficult to put this any way other than bluntly, readers — “... whatever change I make, I must make it without ''changing'' anything”.


But this is the thing: change comes from fracture, disruption and when shafts of light are thrown unexpectedly by unintentionally broken windows to iilluminate old problems or new opportunities in wholly unexpected ways.
And so it comes to pass: no out-sourcing program, no employee survey, no cost challenge, no well-being outreach, no human resources initiative in history has been designed to prove out that the executive are a bunch of useless glad-handing dilettantes; that the upper echelons of senior management, though in place for decades, have in that time yielded no apparent value; that the problem is not the cost of front-line staff but of the sediment of management above them getting in the way of them nimble reaction to the needs and desires of the markets they operate. I dare say it would be rather fun if someone were to try, but with would be a work of science fiction indeed.
 
''Turkeys don’t vote for Christmas.'' Only the staff does that, and no-one listens to them
 
But here is the thing: change comes from fracture, disruption and when shafts of light are thrown unexpectedly by unintentionally broken windows to iilluminate old problems or new opportunities in wholly unexpected ways.


If you are a leader in your organisation, your thought leadership — to the extent it is directed toward organizational change, is bunk.
If you are a leader in your organisation, your thought leadership — to the extent it is directed toward organizational change, is bunk.

Navigation menu