Law firm seminar: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|work|}}All right, my little chicklings. This is a heartfelt plea to you on behalf of those of us who’ve been in this game for years and are obliged, by regulation,<ref>All right this isn’t strictly true anymore, but it sort of is.</ref> to sit through [[continuing professional development]] seminars, to make them at least ''tolerable'' and, if you can, ''entertaining''.   
{{a|work|}}WHY ARE ALL LAW-FIRMS SO BAD AT PRESENTING SEMINARS?
 
All right, my little chicklings. This is a heartfelt plea to you on behalf of those of us who’ve been in this game for years and are obliged, by regulation,<ref>All right this isn’t strictly true anymore, but it sort of is.</ref> to sit through [[continuing professional development]] seminars, to make them at least ''tolerable'' and, if you can, ''entertaining''.   


As a matter of fact I’m sitting though one now, as I write this. It’s about — and I swear I had to check this by looking at the title on the outlook invite, because in forty minutes I’ve absorbed nothing — “Brexit and beyond”.  
As a matter of fact I’m sitting though one now, as I write this. It’s about — and I swear I had to check this by looking at the title on the outlook invite, because in forty minutes I’ve absorbed nothing — “Brexit and beyond”.  


Now I am telling you this not primarily for ''your'' own good, but ''mine''. I crave enlightenment, or failing that entertainment, or failing that distraction, and preferably all three having spent an hour of my time on an exercise, I yearn to depart with ''something'' for my trouble: some kind of enrichment to my lived experience, to borrow a voguish expression. I wish to be in some way better equipped, better informed, armed with better anecdotes, even if it won’t realistically move the needle much on my professional acumen. Well, let’s face it, it won’t will it?
Now I am telling you this not primarily for ''your'' own good, but ''mine''. I crave enlightenment, failing that entertainment, and failing ''that'', mere distraction will do, but preferably I’d like all three: having bent my ears for an hour to your message, I yearn to depart with ''something'' for my trouble: some kind of enrichment to my “lived experience”, to borrow a vogue expression.  
 
I want to be in some way better equipped, better informed, armed with better anecdotes, even if it won’t realistically move the needle much on my professional acumen.<ref>Well, let’s face it, it won’t will it?</ref> IS THIS REALLY TOO MUCH TO ASK?


But what is good for me is good for you: if I must be spoken at for seventeen hours a year — and I must: the Law Society says so — this the chance for those who will do the speaking to sell themselves to me. So, ''please'': transport me away from my [[tedious]] mortal shell. Telescope me into a wondrous new world where I am piqued, thrilled, bettered and, mostly, ''entertained''.
After all, what is good for ''me'' is good for ''you'': if the lords of our profession declare that every member ''must be spoken at'' on topics of professional advancement, for an aggregated period each year — and, okay, they don’t really, any more, but this hasn’t stopped the military industrial complex of law firm seminars — this the chance for those doing the speaking ''to a bit of marketing''. Sell yourselves, friends. ''PLEASE''. Transport me, for an hour, away from my [[tedious]] mortal shell. Telescope me into a wondrous new world where I am piqued, thrilled, bettered and, mostly, ''entertained''.


Brexit and beyond: there is so much scope for levity here. Buzz Lightyear! Put Dominic Cummings in a Buzz Lightyear outfit! Something! Anything!
Brexit and beyond: there is so much scope for levity here. Buzz Lightyear! Put Dominic Cummings in a Buzz Lightyear outfit! Something! Anything!

Navigation menu