Innovation paradox: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
::— The [[JC]]’s maxims for a happy life.}}
::— The [[JC]]’s maxims for a happy life.}}


Behold, the [[Innovation paradox]]: Why does [[reg tech]] promise so much but deliver so little?   
Behold, the [[Innovation paradox]]: Why does [[legaltech]] promise so much but deliver so little?   


''Is'' it a {{tag|paradox}}, though?
''Is'' it a {{tag|paradox}}, though?
Line 27: Line 27:
''That’s what lawyers do. [[It is not in my nature|It is in our nature]]''.
''That’s what lawyers do. [[It is not in my nature|It is in our nature]]''.


Yet, yet yet: many painful artefacts of the analogue era — the gremlins and hair-balls you would expect [[technology]] to remove — ''persist''. To this day, we ''still'' have [[side letter]]s and [[amendment agreement]]s. We ''still'' write: “[[this page is intentionally left blank]]”. We — well, our [[US Attorney|American]] friends, at any rate — ''still'' say “[[this clause is reserved]],” as if we haven’t noticed [[Microsoft Word]] has an automatic paragraph numbering system.<ref>Albeit one that almost no-one knows how to use. It is a truth universally acknowledged that no [[lawyer]] on God’s earth can competently format a document in [[Microsoft Word]].</ref> Not only has [[reg tech|regtech]] ''failed'' to remove legacy [[Complication|complications]], ''it has created entirely new ones.''
Yet, yet yet: many painful artefacts of the analogue era — the gremlins and hair-balls you would expect [[technology]] to remove — ''persist''. To this day, we ''still'' have [[side letter]]s and [[amendment agreement]]s. We ''still'' write: “[[this page is intentionally left blank]]”. We — well, our [[US Attorney|American]] friends, at any rate — ''still'' say “[[this clause is reserved]],” as if we haven’t noticed [[Microsoft Word]] has an automatic paragraph numbering system.<ref>Albeit one that almost no-one knows how to use. It is a truth universally acknowledged that no [[lawyer]] on God’s earth can competently format a document in [[Microsoft Word]].</ref> Not only has [[legaltech]] ''failed'' to remove legacy [[Complication|complications]], ''it has created entirely new ones.''


*Are there any fewer lawyers today? No.<ref>There are more than ever: [https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/warning-as-number-of-solicitors-tops-140000/5063349.article The number of practising solicitors in England and Wales has reached another all-time high] — ''Law Gazette''.</ref>  
*Are there any fewer lawyers today? No.<ref>There are more than ever: [https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/warning-as-number-of-solicitors-tops-140000/5063349.article The number of practising solicitors in England and Wales has reached another all-time high] — ''Law Gazette''.</ref>  
Line 52: Line 52:
*[[Innovation]]
*[[Innovation]]
*[[Natural language processing]]
*[[Natural language processing]]
*[[Reg tech]]
*[[Legaltech]]
{{c|paradox}}
{{c|paradox}}
{{ref}}
{{ref}}

Navigation menu