Bernie Madoff: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 4: Line 4:


This is enough to make us wonder whether the problem of endemic fraud isn’t one of [[bad apple]]s so much, though for sure Bernie Madoff ''was'' a bad apple, but our innate susceptibility to bad actors which, in turn, might be a regrettable by-product of a laudable quality — like trust, for example. In which case, we wonder whether it isn’t better not to assume that laws and regulations can protect us against bad apples, when clearly they can’t, but instead to develop our own bullshit detectors. If you were going to do a podcast series about it, you might call it [[the dog in the night time]].
This is enough to make us wonder whether the problem of endemic fraud isn’t one of [[bad apple]]s so much, though for sure Bernie Madoff ''was'' a bad apple, but our innate susceptibility to bad actors which, in turn, might be a regrettable by-product of a laudable quality — like trust, for example. In which case, we wonder whether it isn’t better not to assume that laws and regulations can protect us against bad apples, when clearly they can’t, but instead to develop our own bullshit detectors. If you were going to do a podcast series about it, you might call it [[the dog in the night time]].
That renowned [[rent seeker]]s like [[Fairfield Sentry]] were caught properly with their pants down, private parts dangling hairily in the custard, revealing top the world another great ugly truth about fund management — perhaps an even more repellent one than Madoff’s fraud, which was at least daring, is something else to be thankful for, if it were not so dispiriting to think how much similar ticket clippetry carries on unchecked and unremarked upon.


{{sa}}
{{sa}}

Navigation menu