Calculation Agent: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|isda|{{image|Calculation Agent|png|Secret Co-Calculation Agent [[Georgie Esterman]], in a still from Otto {{buchstein}}’s under-appreciated 1952 [[Opco Boone]] noir'' The [[Co-calculation agent|Co-Calculation Agent]] Who Loved Me''}}}}{{d|Calculation Agent|/ˌkælkjʊˈleɪʃən ˈeɪʤənt/|n}}One who ''calculates'' things on behalf of contracting counterparties. In theory, under any kind of contract, but in practice, mainly in the ISDA extended fan-fiction universe, and in the documentation of bonds. To be fruitlessly compared and contrasted with a ''[[determination agent]]'', who ''determines'' things on behalf of contracting counterparties.
{{a|isda|{{image|Calculation Agent|png|Secret Co-Calculation Agent [[Georgie Esterman]], in a still from Otto {{buchstein}}’s under-appreciated 1952 [[Opco Boone]] noir'' The [[Co-calculation agent|Co-Calculation Agent]] Who Loved Me''}}}}{{d|Calculation Agent|/ˌkælkjʊˈleɪʃən ˈeɪʤənt/|n}}One who ''calculates'' things on behalf of contracting counterparties. In theory, under any kind of contract, but in practice, mainly in the ISDA extended fan-fiction universe, and in the documentation of bonds. To be endlessly compared and contrasted with a ''[[determination agent]]'', who ''determines'' things on behalf of contracting counterparties.


Do “calculation” and “determination” differ? Not as far as this correspondent can see. But that won't stop [[legal eagle|over-enthusiastic members of the bar]] waxing lengthily about how they do.<ref>Pedants will note the different roles played by the {{eqderivprov|Calculation Agent}} and the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}} in the {{eqdefs}}.</ref>
Do “calculation” and “determination” differ? Not as far as this correspondent can see. You tend to say, perversely, that a Calculation Agent ''determines'' things, and a Determination Agent ''calculates'' things, but largely because elegant prose has a horror of repetition. But will that stop [[legal eagle|over-enthusiastic members of the bar]] waxing lengthily about how they ''do'' differ? it will not.<ref>Pedants will note the different roles played by the {{eqderivprov|Calculation Agent}} and the {{eqderivprov|Determining Party}} in the {{eqdefs}}.</ref>


===In the ISDA===
===In the ISDA===
Line 10: Line 10:
How strongly each feels about this will depend on the sort of products they’re expecting to trade: [[FX]] and simple [[equity derivative|equity derivatives]] have a deep, liquid, observable markets, and as there’s little scope for picking a fight, a [[dealer]] {{isdaprov|Calculation Agent}} may not be bothered about ceding rights to dispute its calculations. Expect a different reaction should you seek to second-guess your [[dealer]]’s marks on exotic [[credit derivative|credit derivatives]], on the other hand. These rely enormously on the dealer’s internal models, pricing curves and other kinds of idiosyncratic financial [[bullshit|alchemy]] that are almost certainly unique to the [[dealer]] in question.
How strongly each feels about this will depend on the sort of products they’re expecting to trade: [[FX]] and simple [[equity derivative|equity derivatives]] have a deep, liquid, observable markets, and as there’s little scope for picking a fight, a [[dealer]] {{isdaprov|Calculation Agent}} may not be bothered about ceding rights to dispute its calculations. Expect a different reaction should you seek to second-guess your [[dealer]]’s marks on exotic [[credit derivative|credit derivatives]], on the other hand. These rely enormously on the dealer’s internal models, pricing curves and other kinds of idiosyncratic financial [[bullshit|alchemy]] that are almost certainly unique to the [[dealer]] in question.


====[[Co-calculation agent]]====
===[[Co-calculation agent]]===
{{cocalculationagent}}
{{cocalculationagent}}
====Other ISDA booklets====
===Other ISDA booklets===
 
The term is defined separately in each definition booklet:
The term is defined separately in each definition booklet:
*In the {{eqdefs}} at Section {{eqderivprov|1.40}};
*In the {{eqdefs}} at Section {{eqderivprov|1.40}};
*In the {{funddefs}} (in virtually identical terms to the {{eqdefs}}) at Section {{funddefprov|1.27}};
*In the {{funddefs}} (in virtually identical terms to the {{eqdefs}}) at Section {{funddefprov|1.27}};
*In the {{commoddefs}} at greater length in Section {{commoddefprov|4.5}};
*In the {{commoddefs}} at greater length in Section {{commoddefprov|4.5}};
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*{{eqdefsprov|determining Party}}
*{{eqdefsprov|determining Party}}

Navigation menu