This time it’s different: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 10: Line 10:
Stiffen your sinews if you hear this one.  
Stiffen your sinews if you hear this one.  


So the strangest thing about the “this time it's different” crowd is how closely it maps to people who believe in a [[determinism|determinist]], [[algorithm]]ic recurring, predictable universe of the kind where things definitively will ''not'' be different.
So the strangest thing about the “this time it's different” crowd is how closely they map to the [[reductionist]]s, who believe in a [[determinism|determinist]], [[algorithm]]ic recurring, predictable universe of the kind where things definitively will ''not'' be different.


All the [[data]] piling up, pointing determinedly backward as it does, viewing the the unfolding universe in its rear-view mirror as the great agglomeration of instantly stale information we collect about everything that has already happened necessarily is, including as it does every fuck-up, ''surely'' should tell you, if it tells you ''anything'' at all, that ''there will be fuck-ups''.  
All the [[data]] piling up, pointing determinedly backward as it does, viewing the the unfolding universe in its rear-view mirror as the [[great agglomeration]] of instantly stale information we collect about everything that has already happened that it necessarily is, including as it does ''every'' fuck-up, even though unanticipated fuck-ups outweigh predictable successes 1,000:1, ''surely'' should tell you, if it tells you ''anything'' at all, that ''there will be fuck-ups''.  


People will be disappointed. People ''will lose money'', in distressingly predictable ways. The universe will ''not'' be suddenly better disposed to the same wilful, wistful, misty-eyed optimism that it has hitherto crushed. For, however measly, niggardly and useless our data is, however infinitesimally tiny a subset it is of ''all possible data, in all times, all places and all dimensions , anywhere in the total space-time of our multi-hued universe, the ''one thing'' it tells us, the single inference we can, with sparkling clarity, draw is that there will be fuck-ups''.  
People will be disappointed. People ''will lose money'', in unpredictable and  predictable ways. The universe will ''not'' be suddenly better disposed to the same wilful, wistful, wishful, misty-eyed optimism that it has hitherto ''crushed like a bug'' at every opportunity.  


So isn’t it the richest of dyspeptic ironies that these millenarian, futurologist, reductionist thought-leaders, data pioneers all, somehow manage to extrapolate from this catalogue of resounding woe, that the forward plan for this new fangled-idea is ''different ''.
For, however measly, paltry and useless the data have collected is, however infinitesimally ''tiny'' a subset it is of all possible data, in all times, at all places and through all dimensions, anywhere in the total space-time of our multi-hued universe, the ''one thing'' it tells us, the single inference we can, with sparkling clarity, draw is that ''there will be fuck-ups''.
 
So isn’t it the richest of dyspeptic ironies that these millenarian, futurologist, [[reductionist]] thought-leaders, data pioneers all, somehow manage to extrapolate from this catalogue of resounding woe, that the forward plan for this new fangled-idea is ''different ''.


No?
No?

Navigation menu