To the fullest extent permissible by law: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
“Okay, okay, I ''get'' it. You aren’t responsible. ''Jesus''. Calm ''down'' already.”
“Okay, okay, I ''get'' it. You aren’t responsible. ''Jesus''. Calm ''down'' already.”


Now should it transpire that the full extent of the law did not allow the Issuer off the hook, well — happy days — but the Issuer gains nothing by adding this in the interim. And ''not'' saying it hardly makes the Issuer’s position worse, does it?
Now, should it transpire that the fullest extent of the law— and we wuite like the idea there are gentle stretches further down the legal river that aren’t as wet ’n’ wild as the far reaches of its fullest extent — did not allow the Issuer off the hook, well — for investors, happy days; they’re in the money — but even so, the Issuer gains nothing by adding text acknowledging this contingency in the interim.  
 
And ''not'' saying it hardly makes the Issuer’s position worse, does it?
{{egg}}
{{egg}}
{{ref}}
{{ref}}

Navigation menu