82,792
edits
Microsoft Word: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Image|Tippex on screen|jpg|Getting rid of those carriage returns one stroke at a time}} | {{Image|Tippex on screen|jpg|Getting rid of those carriage returns one stroke at a time}} | ||
}}{{quote|“Track changes is the thief of joy.”<ref>He may have said “comparison” but this is what he meant.</ref> | }}{{quote|“Track changes is the thief of joy.”<ref>He may have said “comparison” but this is what he meant.</ref> | ||
:—Theodore Roosevelt}}Word processing {{tag|software}} that never quite managed to sort out auto-paragraph numbering but nonetheless sweeps all other office word-processing software before it. | :—Theodore Roosevelt}}{{d|{{PAGENAME}}|/ˈmaɪkrəsɒft wɜːd/|n}} | ||
Word processing {{tag|software}} that never quite managed to sort out auto-paragraph numbering but nonetheless sweeps all other office word-processing software before it. | |||
Refuseniks may prefer [[Microsoft PowerPoint]] (if trained in [[middle management]]) or even [[Microsoft Excel]] (if accountancy) as a canvass for composing documents. But the days of purpose-built alternative word-processing software packages, like Lotus Notes or WordPerfect or even the admirable but, preternaturally doomed open-source application OpenOffice are long gone. Google Docs might survive, but only because it purports to fill a very different need. And, ''Google''. | Refuseniks may prefer [[Microsoft PowerPoint]] (if trained in [[middle management]]) or even [[Microsoft Excel]] (if accountancy) as a canvass for composing documents. But the days of purpose-built alternative word-processing software packages, like Lotus Notes or WordPerfect or even the admirable but, preternaturally doomed open-source application OpenOffice are long gone. Google Docs might survive, but only because it purports to fill a very different need. And, ''Google''. | ||