Path-dependent: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Path-dependent (view source)

Revision as of 09:22, 30 January 2023

1,710 bytes removed ,  30 January 2023
no edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 50: Line 50:


===Pragmatist’s prayer and the infinite game===
===Pragmatist’s prayer and the infinite game===
[[Finite and Infinite Games|Finite and infinite games]] is, as ever, a great [[metaphor]] for framing these battles of the past and present. For what is a “[[lived experience]]”,  a “[[grievance]]” or a “[[standpoint]]”, if not an articulation of ''history''?
{{Standpoint capsule}}
 
The future contains ''unlived'' experiences. There ''are'' no ''grievances''. Our standpoints, the margins and their intersections are ''unknown''.
 
Being historical, a lived experience is permanent, and set it stone. It cannot be moved. It cannot be removed. It cannot be compensated for. It cannot be denied. It becomes a monument. A shibboleth. A sacred prophecy. But it is our imaginative construction. We choose our significant events. We build our own memorials. We choose to live beneath their shadows. But our present is a function of every point in the past, not just the ones it's suits us to settle on.
 
This is the empathetic stance. To adopt a historical narrative: to step into its shoes, to take sides, to exalt it and perpetuate its ''grievance''.
 
But, look: standpoints ''iterate''. As the present moves through spacetime,  we lay down the tracks of future, each new decision we make contributes to our lived experience. We update our standpoints.  The decisions of the past for all further away in time and significance. It is an inverse square.
 
The [[infinite game]] counsels us to look at where we are, see what we’ve got and make the best of it. It focuses on the decisions of the now and the possibilities of the future. It regards the past as informational and instructive, not constraining. If I once hit my thumb with a hammer, I know to be careful next time I have a hammer. It does not make me forever a victim of hammer abuse.
===The past as a formal system===
===The past as a formal system===
Not also the idea that the past is a single formal causal chain, that we know about, is is a classic example of legibility in the sense articulated by [[James C. Scott]] in {{br|Seeing Like a State}}.  
Not also the idea that the past is a single formal causal chain, that we know about, is is a classic example of legibility in the sense articulated by [[James C. Scott]] in {{br|Seeing Like a State}}.  
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Special:MobileDiff/71286"

Navigation menu