World peace: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
There are no disputes, doubts, disagreements or ''contrarians''. If one were even possible a contrarian would simply be ''one who is wrong''. But a contrarian would not be possible. ''Error'' would not be possible. Indecision would not be possible. If it were possible to err, it would be possible to dispute the consensus, and that would create ''conflict''.
There are no disputes, doubts, disagreements or ''contrarians''. If one were even possible a contrarian would simply be ''one who is wrong''. But a contrarian would not be possible. ''Error'' would not be possible. Indecision would not be possible. If it were possible to err, it would be possible to dispute the consensus, and that would create ''conflict''.


Lasting world peace implies, in short, ''the end of days''.
Lasting world peace implies, in short, ''[[End of days|the end of days]]''.
 


{{sa}}
{{sa}}
Line 24: Line 25:
*[[Simulation hypothesis]]
*[[Simulation hypothesis]]
*The [[Singularity]]
*The [[Singularity]]
*[[Apocalypse]]

Navigation menu