82,853
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|design|{{subtable| | {{a|design|}} | ||
''' | <div class="fontsize"> | ||
{{subtable| | |||
'''1 LEVEL 1''' | |||
1.1 '''Level 2''': Lorem ipsum | 1.1 '''Level 2''': Lorem ipsum | ||
Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
::(ii) '''Level 4''': Lorem ipsum | ::(ii) '''Level 4''': Lorem ipsum | ||
'''2. LEVEL 1''': Lorem ipsum | '''2. LEVEL 1''': Lorem ipsum | ||
</div> | |||
When constructing a legal document, once you have agreed on a multiple-level numbering system — and you should — for God’s sake indent the different numbering levels. This at a moment discloses the structure and logic of your document. The reader can immediately see the relation of each paragraph to the others. | |||
Most lawyers are intimidated by Microsoft Word’s automatic numbering system, and with good reason: it is fragile, capricious and easily broken. But they still use it. So should you. And once you have ''semantically'' organised your tract into a logical structure, do the world a favour and ''visually'' organise it that way too. | Most lawyers are intimidated by Microsoft Word’s automatic numbering system, and with good reason: it is fragile, capricious and easily broken. But they still use it. So should you. And once you have ''semantically'' organised your tract into a logical structure, do the world a favour and ''visually'' organise it that way too. |