82,891
edits
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
The doubtlessly well-intended efficiencies that [[Modernism|modern(ist) management theory]] promise and the the new vistas the information revolution have opened have multiplied the opportunities to defend the existing structure. Technology can be deployed to defend power structures just as easily as to dissolve them, and those within the orthodoxy have the resources to do it. | The doubtlessly well-intended efficiencies that [[Modernism|modern(ist) management theory]] promise and the the new vistas the information revolution have opened have multiplied the opportunities to defend the existing structure. Technology can be deployed to defend power structures just as easily as to dissolve them, and those within the orthodoxy have the resources to do it. | ||
There is the challenge that faces legal industry thought-leaders and [[JC|smug self-publishing wiki-writers]] alike: how to get inside that hay-maker cultural punch? How to bring long-term change to deeply embedded behaviours and change institutions to make them more effective, more efficient, less of a gravy train, less ''preposterous''? | There is the challenge that faces legal industry thought-leaders and [[JC|smug self-publishing wiki-writers]] alike: how to get inside that hay-maker cultural punch? How to bring long-term change to deeply embedded behaviours and change institutions to make them more effective, more efficient, less of a gravy train, less ''preposterous''? | ||