82,155
edits
Barclays v Unicredit: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "A good outing for the Civil Division of the Court of Appeal (Queen's Bench Division) which raises the question of what is “commercially reasonable” in the context of deter...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A good outing for the Civil Division of the Court of Appeal (Queen's Bench Division) which raises the question of what is | A good outing for the Civil Division of the Court of Appeal (Queen's Bench Division) which raises the question of what is “{{tag|commercially reasonable}}” in the context of determinations made by parties to financial instruments. Certain guarantees issued by Barclays granted Unicredit optional termination rights some of which required Barclays’ prior consent | ||
“to be determined by [Barclays] in a commercially reasonable manner.” | “to be determined by [Barclays] in a commercially reasonable manner.” | ||