Template:Exposure under csa: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
===Relevance of Section {{isdaprov|6}} to the peacetime operation of the {{csa}}===
===Relevance of Section {{isdaprov|6}} to the peacetime operation of the Credit Support Annex===
The calculation of {{csaprov|Exposure}} under the {{csa}} is modelled on the Section {{isdaprov|6(e)(ii)}} termination methodology following a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} where there is one {{isdaprov|Affected Party}}, which in turn tracks the Section {{isdaprov|6(e)(i)}} methodology following an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}, only taking [[mid-market valuation]]s and not those on the {{isdaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}}’s side.
The calculation of {{{{{1`}}}|Exposure}} under the CSA is modelled on the Section {{isdaprov|6(e)(ii)}} termination methodology following a {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} where there is one {{isdaprov|Affected Party}}, which in turn tracks the Section {{isdaprov|6(e)(i)}} methodology following an {{isdaprov|Event of Default}}, only taking [[mid-market valuation]]s and not those on the {{isdaprov|Non-Defaulting Party}}’s side.


This means you calculate the {{csaprov|Exposure}} as:
This means you calculate the {{{{{1}}}|Exposure}} as:
::(a) the {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}}s for each {{isdaprov|Terminated Transaction}} '''plus''' <br>
::(a) the {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}}s for each {{isdaprov|Terminated Transaction}} '''plus''' <br>
::(b) {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amounts}} due to the {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}}; '''minus''' <br>
::(b) {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amounts}} due to the {{isdaprov|Non-defaulting Party}}; '''minus''' <br>
::(c) {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amounts}} due to the {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}.<br>
::(c) {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amounts}} due to the {{isdaprov|Defaulting Party}}.<br>


This is interesting because, as of its {{isdadefsprov|Termination Date|2006}} the {{isdaprov|Transaction}} may be no more, but until those final exchanges are settled the obligations they represent — “{{isdaprov|Unpaid Amount}}s” in the argot of Section {{isdaprov|6(e)}} — still exist and are included in the calculation of the {{csaprov|Exposure}}.
This is interesting because, as of its {{isdadefsprov|Termination Date|2006}} the {{isdaprov|Transaction}} may be no more, but until those final exchanges are settled the obligations they represent — “{{isdaprov|Unpaid Amount}}s” in the argot of Section {{isdaprov|6(e)}} — still exist and are included in the calculation of the {{{{{1}}}|Exposure}}.


Now, on the day you are meant to make that final settlement, which when (ahem — ''if'') settled, would reduce your {{csaprov|Exposure}}, you will call for your {{csaprov|Delivery Amount}} or {{csaprov|Return Amount}} assuming it has not (yet) been paid. By the time the Credit Support adjustment has been settled, that final settlement will have happened, meaning the person who paid the adjustment will be out of pocket, and will need to call it back (using the same process).
Now, on the day you are meant to make that final settlement, which when (ahem — ''if'') settled, would reduce your {{{{{1}}}|Exposure}}, you will call for your {{{{{1}}}|Delivery Amount}} or {{{{{1}}}|Return Amount}} assuming it has not (yet) been paid. By the time the Credit Support adjustment has been settled, that final settlement will have happened, meaning the person who paid the adjustment will be out of pocket, and will need to call it back (using the same process).


Fun times in the world of [[collateral]] [[operations]].
Fun times in the world of [[collateral]] [[operations]].

Revision as of 10:40, 24 May 2021

Relevance of Section 6 to the peacetime operation of the Credit Support Annex

The calculation of {{{{{1`}}}|Exposure}} under the CSA is modelled on the Section 6(e)(ii) termination methodology following a Termination Event where there is one Affected Party, which in turn tracks the Section 6(e)(i) methodology following an Event of Default, only taking mid-market valuations and not those on the Non-Defaulting Party’s side.

This means you calculate the {{{{{1}}}|Exposure}} as:

(a) the Close-out Amounts for each Terminated Transaction plus
(b) Unpaid Amounts due to the Non-defaulting Party; minus
(c) Unpaid Amounts due to the Defaulting Party.

This is interesting because, as of its Termination Date the Transaction may be no more, but until those final exchanges are settled the obligations they represent — “Unpaid Amounts” in the argot of Section 6(e) — still exist and are included in the calculation of the {{{{{1}}}|Exposure}}.

Now, on the day you are meant to make that final settlement, which when (ahem — if) settled, would reduce your {{{{{1}}}|Exposure}}, you will call for your {{{{{1}}}|Delivery Amount}} or {{{{{1}}}|Return Amount}} assuming it has not (yet) been paid. By the time the Credit Support adjustment has been settled, that final settlement will have happened, meaning the person who paid the adjustment will be out of pocket, and will need to call it back (using the same process).

Fun times in the world of collateral operations.