Template:Isda 9(g) summ: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
So suddenly, in Section {{{{{1}}}|9(g)}} of all places<ref>What am I to make of the headings before Section 9 that, being a logical fellow, I have already read?</ref>, the members of {{icds}} wake up out of their collective fever dream, and this is what they say: It’s like, “okay, so we wrote them; we did put them here — hands up, we admit it — ''but we don’t mean anything by them''”.  
So suddenly, in Section {{{{{1}}}|9(g)}} of all places, the members of {{icds}} wake up out of their collective fever dream, and this is what they say: It’s like, “okay, so we wrote them; we did put them here — hands up, we admit it — ''but we don’t mean anything by them''”. And what is a fellow to make of the headings ''before'' Section {{{{{1}}}|9}} that, short days ago, being a logical fellow, I read, enjoyed and imbued with symbolic meaning? Am I supposed to just throw that crystalline construct ''away'' now? It just seems such a waste.


Don’t you just ''love'' [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyers]]?
Don’t you just ''love'' [[Mediocre lawyer|lawyers]]?

Latest revision as of 15:16, 17 April 2020

So suddenly, in Section {{{{{1}}}|9(g)}} of all places, the members of ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ wake up out of their collective fever dream, and this is what they say: It’s like, “okay, so we wrote them; we did put them here — hands up, we admit it — but we don’t mean anything by them”. And what is a fellow to make of the headings before Section {{{{{1}}}|9}} that, short days ago, being a logical fellow, I read, enjoyed and imbued with symbolic meaning? Am I supposed to just throw that crystalline construct away now? It just seems such a waste.

Don’t you just love lawyers?

Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:Isda_9(g)_summ&oldid=43801"