Template:M comp disc 1992 ISDA Termination Event: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ISDAnumberingdiscrepancy}}
{{isdacomparison}} {{ISDAnumberingdiscrepancy}}


{{isdacomparison}}
A {{isda92prov|Termination Event}} is an event justifying one party unilaterally terminating a {{isda92prov|Transaction}} — or sometimes all {{isda92prov|Transactions}} — but that is generally of a nature that does not cast aspersions of impropriety on the other, or “[[Affected Party - ISDA Provision|Affected]]”, party. This makes a difference when it comes to how one calculates the {{isda92prov|Close-out Amount}} for the Transaction in question.
 
A {{isdaprov|Termination Event}} is an event justifying one party unilaterally terminating a {{isdaprov|Transaction}} — or sometimes all {{isdaprov|Transactions}} — but that is generally of a nature that does not cast aspersions of impropriety on the other, or “[[Affected Party - ISDA Provision|Affected]]”, party. This makes a difference when it comes to how one calculates the {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}} for the Transaction in question.

Revision as of 08:20, 27 September 2022

A comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA can be found on the ISDA Comparison page.

Numbering Discrepancy: Note the numbering discrepancy in Section 5(b) between the 1992 ISDA and 2002 ISDA. This is caused by a new 5(b)(ii) (Force Majeure Event) in the 2002 ISDA before Tax Event, which is thus shunted from Section 5(b)(ii) (in the 1992 ISDA) to Section 5(b)(iii) (in the 2002 ISDA).

A Termination Event is an event justifying one party unilaterally terminating a Transaction — or sometimes all Transactions — but that is generally of a nature that does not cast aspersions of impropriety on the other, or “Affected”, party. This makes a difference when it comes to how one calculates the Close-out Amount for the Transaction in question.