Template:M comp disc 2002 ISDA 3: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tocbuilder|ISDA|2002|3}}
{{tocbuilder|ISDA|2002|3}}
There is no No Agency representation in the {{1992}}. Part of the ritual of negotiating a 92 ISDA was to put one in, so when those kill-joys on {{icds}} shunted one into the {{2002ma}} it will have really ruined a few people’s days — so much so that, in some quarters, they still use the {{1992ma}} as a standard. Americans.
There is no “{{isdaprov|No Agency}}” representation in the {{1992ma}}. Part of the ritual of negotiating a 92 ISDA was to put one in, so when those kill-joys on {{icds}} shunted one into the {{2002ma}} it will have really ruined a few people’s days — so much so that, in some quarters, they still use the {{1992ma}} as a standard. Americans.

Revision as of 15:49, 13 September 2022

3 Representations

3(a) Basic Representations
3(b) Absence of certain events
3(c) Absence of litigation
3(d) Accuracy of Specified Information
3(e) Payer Tax Representations
3(f) Payee Tax Representations
3(g) No Agency (2002 ISDA only)

There is no “No Agency” representation in the 1992 ISDA. Part of the ritual of negotiating a 92 ISDA was to put one in, so when those kill-joys on ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ shunted one into the 2002 ISDA it will have really ruined a few people’s days — so much so that, in some quarters, they still use the 1992 ISDA as a standard. Americans.