Template:M summ 2002 ISDA 2(d): Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Section {{isdaprov|2(d)}} does the following: *'''Net obligation''': if a counterparty suffers withholding it generally doesn’t have to gross up – it just remits tax to th...")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
*'''Refund obligation where tax subsequently levied''': if a counterparty pays gross and subsequently is levied the tax, the recipient must refund an equivalent amount to the tax.  
*'''Refund obligation where tax subsequently levied''': if a counterparty pays gross and subsequently is levied the tax, the recipient must refund an equivalent amount to the tax.  
*'''{{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}''': the one exception is “{{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}” - this is tax arises as a result of the payer’s own status vis-à-vis the withholding jurisdiction. In that case the payer has to gross up, courtesy of a magnificent [[quintuple negative]].
*'''{{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}''': the one exception is “{{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}” - this is tax arises as a result of the payer’s own status vis-à-vis the withholding jurisdiction. In that case the payer has to gross up, courtesy of a magnificent [[quintuple negative]].
====Stamp Tax covered elsewhere====
====[[Stamp Tax - ISDA Provision|Stamp Tax]] covered elsewhere====
{{isdaprov|Stamp Tax}} reimbursement obligations are covered at {{isdaprov|4(e)}}, not here.
{{isdaprov|Stamp Tax}} reimbursement obligations are covered at {{isdaprov|4(e)}}, not here.
 
{{Withholding under ISDA|isdaprov}}
{{Withholding under ISDA}}

Revision as of 23:00, 27 March 2020

Section 2(d) does the following:

  • Net obligation: if a counterparty suffers withholding it generally doesn’t have to gross up – it just remits tax to the revenue and pays net.
  • Refund obligation where tax subsequently levied: if a counterparty pays gross and subsequently is levied the tax, the recipient must refund an equivalent amount to the tax.
  • Indemnifiable Tax: the one exception is “Indemnifiable Tax” - this is tax arises as a result of the payer’s own status vis-à-vis the withholding jurisdiction. In that case the payer has to gross up, courtesy of a magnificent quintuple negative.

Stamp Tax covered elsewhere

Stamp Tax reimbursement obligations are covered at 4(e), not here.

Withholding under the ISDA

TL;DR: The basic rationale is this:

The combination of the Payer Tax Representations and the Gross-Up clause of the ISDA Master Agreement has the following effect:

  • Section 3(e): I promise you that I do not have to withhold on my payments to you (as long as all your Payee Tax Representations are correct and you have, under Section 4(a), given me everything I need to pay free of withholding);
  • Section 2(d): I will not withhold on any payments to you. Unless I am required to by law. Which I kind of told you I wasn’t... If I have to withhold, I'll pay the tax the authorities and give you the receipt. If I only had to withhold because of my connection to the taxing jurisdiction (that is, if the withholding is an Indemnifiable Tax), I’ll gross you up. (You should look at the drafting of Indemnifiable Tax, by the way. It's quite a marvel). ...
  • Gross-Up: Unless the tax could have been avoided if the Payee had taken made all its 3(f) representations, delivered all its 4(a) material, or had its 3(f) representations been, like, true).
  • Stamp Tax is a whole other thing.
  • As is FATCA, which (as long as you’ve made your FATCA Amendment or signed up to a FATCA Protocol, provides that FATCA Withholding Taxes are excluded from the Section 3(e) Payer Tax Representations, and also from the definition of Indemnifiable Tax. Meaning one doesn't have to rep, or gross up, FATCA payments.