Template:M summ 2002 ISDA Applicable Close-out Rate: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Replaced content with "{{isda Applicable Close-out Rate summ|isdaprov}}")
Tag: Replaced
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Truly from the {{isia}} file — almost in the [[shoot me]] file. You can sense the pragmatists in {{icds}} — if there are any — had well and truly tuned out by the time they got to this definition.
{{isda Applicable Close-out Rate summ|isdaprov}}
 
You have the {{isdaprov|Default Rate}}, the {{isdaprov|Non-default Rate}}, the {{isdaprov|Applicable Deferral Rate}}, and the {{isdaprov|Termination Rate}}. Depending on how and why you have closed out the {{2002ma}}, and whether you were at fault, a different rate will apply.
 
The four rates are:
*{{Nutshell 2002 ISDA Default Rate}}
*{{Nutshell 2002 ISDA Non-default Rate}}
*{{Nutshell 2002 ISDA Applicable Deferral Rate}}
*{{Nutshell 2002 ISDA Termination Rate}}

Latest revision as of 14:41, 3 January 2024

Truly from the I’m sorry I asked file — almost in the shoot me file. This whole game of pan-dimensional chess, with six different Applicable Close-out Rates to apply in different circumstances, is all just to work out how to accrue interest on Unpaid Amounts and Early Termination Amounts during the close-out process. Considering that the said payer of this Applicable Close-out Rate is, Q.E.D., a dead duck at the time, and is unlikely to be able to pay much of anything, let alone elevated penalty interest, it really should not have been this hard.

You get a strong sense that the pragmatists of ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ — if there are any — had well and truly tuned out and gone to the bar by the ’squad got to this definition. Looking on the bright side, at least it doesn’t mention LIBOR.[1]

  1. Dramatic Chipmunk.png
    Did someone say LIBOR?