Template:Nutshell Equity Derivatives Triple Cocktail: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Nutshell Equity Derivatives 12.9(a)(ii)}} | {{Nutshell Equity Derivatives 12.9(a)(ii)}} | ||
---- | ---- | ||
{{Nutshell Equity Derivatives 12.9(a)( | {{Nutshell Equity Derivatives 12.9(a)(vi)}} | ||
---- | ---- | ||
{{Nutshell Equity Derivatives 12.9(a)(v)}} | {{Nutshell Equity Derivatives 12.9(a)(v)}} | ||
Revision as of 16:21, 8 January 2021
The famous Triple Cocktail™
- 12.9(a)(ii) “Change in Law” means either party determines that, due to a change in law or regulation:
- (X) it becomes illegal to buy, sell or hold underlying Shares or;
- (Y) it becomes materially more expensive to perform the Transaction.
- 12.9(a)(ii) “Change in Law” means either party determines that, due to a change in law or regulation:
- 12.9(a)(vi) “Increased Cost of Hedging” means that the Hedging Party would incur a materially increased cost under the Transaction to:
- (A) hedge its equity price risk; or
- (B) realise the proceeds of its hedge.
- This excludes costs arising solely from the deterioration of its own creditworthiness.
- 12.9(a)(vi) “Increased Cost of Hedging” means that the Hedging Party would incur a materially increased cost under the Transaction to:
- 12.9(a)(v) “Hedging Disruption” means that the Hedging Party cannot reasonably acquire, hold, replace or unwind any transactions hedging its equity price risk, or realise, recover or pay the proceeds of any hedging transactions.
- 12.9(a)(v) “Hedging Disruption” means that the Hedging Party cannot reasonably acquire, hold, replace or unwind any transactions hedging its equity price risk, or realise, recover or pay the proceeds of any hedging transactions.