Template:Pgmsla nominee capsule: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The reference (in the pledge version only) to a {{pgmslaprov|Nominee}}, we think, is a flag to recognise that the {{pgmsla}} is typically suitable only for agency lending...") |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The reference (in the pledge version only) to a {{pgmslaprov|Nominee}}, we think, is a flag to recognise that the {{pgmsla}} is typically suitable only for [[agency lending]] arrangements, in which the principal {{pgmslaprov|Lender}}s to the {{pgmslaprov|Loan}}s will be wealth-management clients and funds whose assets are managed by an [[agent lender]], | The reference (in the pledge version only) to a {{pgmslaprov|Nominee}}, we think, is a flag to recognise that the {{pgmsla}} is typically suitable only for [[agency lending]] arrangements, in which the principal {{pgmslaprov|Lender}}s to the {{pgmslaprov|Loan}}s will be wealth-management clients and funds whose assets are managed by an [[agent lender]], and who have handed over responsibility for managing their {{pgmslaprov|Loan}}s to the [[agent lender]], who in turn has put the whole business in the hands of a [[triparty agent]], who will manage the collateral flows, pledges and all that good oil. Though why they didn’t say “ tri-party agent”, it is hard to say, since “nominee” has, in other custody contexts, a rather different meaning. And there is nothing to stop folks using a tri-party arrangement with a normal {{gmsla}} either, for that matter, and it has routinely been done for as long as anyone can remember. | ||
Revision as of 17:50, 20 September 2021
The reference (in the pledge version only) to a Nominee, we think, is a flag to recognise that the 2018 Pledge GMSLA is typically suitable only for agency lending arrangements, in which the principal Lenders to the Loans will be wealth-management clients and funds whose assets are managed by an agent lender, and who have handed over responsibility for managing their Loans to the agent lender, who in turn has put the whole business in the hands of a triparty agent, who will manage the collateral flows, pledges and all that good oil. Though why they didn’t say “ tri-party agent”, it is hard to say, since “nominee” has, in other custody contexts, a rather different meaning. And there is nothing to stop folks using a tri-party arrangement with a normal 2010 GMSLA either, for that matter, and it has routinely been done for as long as anyone can remember.