That vs. which: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
{{quote|“I fed the cat that sat on the mat.” ''[implied: ... and I let the other one, which sat in the armchair, go hungry]''.}}
{{quote|“I fed the cat that sat on the mat.” ''[implied: ... and I let the other one, which sat in the armchair, go hungry]''.}}


To be contrasted with '''[[which]]''', being a [[conjunction]] that introduces a ''non''-restrictive subordinate clause:  
To be contrasted with '''[[which]]''', being a [[conjunction]] introducing a ''non''-restrictive subordinate clause:  


{{quote|“The cat, [[which]] sat on the mat, had halitosis.” ''[Its halitosis was not contingent on its location mat-wise; indeed there could be an entirely distinct minty-breathed moggy sitting on the same mat, for all we know.]''}}
{{quote|“The cat, [[which]] sat on the mat, had halitosis.” ''[Its halitosis was not contingent on its location mat-wise; indeed there could be an entirely distinct minty-breathed moggy sitting on the same mat, for all we know.]''}}
Lesson: Get a dog.
{{sa}}
*[[Conjunction]]

Revision as of 15:14, 12 May 2021

Towards more picturesque speech


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

That
/ðət/ (Conj.)
Which
/wɪʧ/ (conj.)

That is a conjunction introducing a restrictive subordinate clause.

“I fed the cat that sat on the mat.” [implied: ... and I let the other one, which sat in the armchair, go hungry].

To be contrasted with which, being a conjunction introducing a non-restrictive subordinate clause:

“The cat, which sat on the mat, had halitosis.” [Its halitosis was not contingent on its location mat-wise; indeed there could be an entirely distinct minty-breathed moggy sitting on the same mat, for all we know.]

Lesson: Get a dog.

See also