The quotidian is a utility, not an asset: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Gizmo pelmanism]] | |||
*[[Intellectual property]] | |||
{{c|Confidentiality}} | {{c|Confidentiality}} |
Revision as of 21:12, 5 March 2021
|
Legal eagles love the idea that standard, boilerplate, tedious terms that make up the lion’s share of commercial legal discourse should be regarded as a common utility; a free public resource, and not some secret sauce that keeps battalions of legal eagles in well-paid but soul-destroying work. Everyone — not just lawyers, come to think of it — likes to believe herself special, privy to something critical; dangerous; delicate — information that, should it fall into the wrong hands, may wreak great ill upon its owner or the poor unsuspecting random.