Ultra vires

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 19:17, 23 February 2020 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Jolly Contrarian’s Glossary
The snippy guide to financial services lingo.™


Index — Click the ᐅ to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

A Latinism meaning beyond its powers, which crops up usually in the context of a corporation or governmental authority exceeding the powers and objects set out in its memorandum and articles of association or charter. Also of some relevance also to a Trust.

In that most valuable and intellectually rewarding pastime of checking a combatant's capacity and authority, ultra vires is the principle concern should it not have the capacity to transact in your chose kind of derivative. These days it is a rather old fashioned notion as far as a corporation goes — in most sensible jurisdicitons it has been partly or entirely ruled out by legislation, but it is liable to induce butterflies if one is dealing with a local authority.

Sovereign immunity and ultra vires: not the same

Don’t confuse sovereign immunity with ultra vires — cue thunder crack at the mention of Orange County or Hammersmith and Fulham council and a dramatic look from our house gopher — for they are quite different things.

  • Ultra vires: If a contract is beyond your powers or capacity to enter into a contract in the first place then it is void ab initio; any payments you have made under that contract are also void and you may reclaim them[1], and you can appeal to the court system to do that. That is to say, ultra vires is an “intra-legal” measure, recognised, defended and enforced by the courts.
  • Sovereign immunity: Sovereign immunity is a different, “extra-legal” thing: it is to say “I am, quite literally, above the law: I am the law, and I do not have to subject myself to the judicial branch of my law — or anyone else’s law — unless I choose to.” This extends to being free from judicial intervention if I decide not to perform my contractual obligations, but it also means I cannot myself resort to the court process to make my counterparty perform its obligations. If I choose to go to court, then I subject myself fully to the courts as regards actions my counterparty wishes to bring against me.

Don’t mention

derivatives and Orange County or Hammersmith and Fulham council

See also

  1. But — quid pro quo, Clarice — any profits you have made you must also disgorge.