Unknown unknown: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{def|Unknown unknown|/ʌnˈnəʊn/|n|}}Something that you don’t know that you don’t know. This of course presents an immediate {{t|paradox}}, because if you ''know'' that you don’t know that you don’t know something — which for you to be talking about unknown unknowns, you must, then this is a [[Known unknown|''known'' unknown unknown]], which we rather think — but to be clear, we don’t ''know'', as such — must be a variety of [[known unknown]]. Which makes it an unknown known unknown unknown. I am pretty certain about this. That is a known unknown known unknown unknown.
{{a|bi|{{knownbox}}}}{{d|Unknown unknown|/ʌnˈnəʊn/|n|}}
 
Something that you don’t know that you don’t know, as famously articulated by [[Donald Rumsfeld]]. This, of course, presents an immediate {{t|paradox}}, because if you ''know'' that you don’t know that you don’t know something — which for you to be talking about unknown unknowns, you must, then this is a [[Known unknown|''known'' unknown unknown]], which I rather think — but to be clear, I don’t ''know'', as such — must be a variety of [[known unknown|''known'' unknown]]. Which makes it an ''unknown'' known unknown unknown. Since I do ''know'' that I am not sure about this I can confidently, and with some relief, rest my case at a known unknown known unknown unknown.
{{unknowns}}
{{unknowns}}
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Risk taxonomy]]
*[[Risk taxonomy]]
*{{risk|Rumsfeld’s taxonomy}}
*{{risk|Rumsfeld’s taxonomy}}

Latest revision as of 08:25, 24 February 2022

The JC’S favourite Big Ideas™
Rumsfeld.jpg
There are five types of known.

The Rumsfeld three:

And the Jolly Contrarian three:

Index: Click to expand:

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

Unknown unknown
/ʌnˈnəʊn/ (n.)

Something that you don’t know that you don’t know, as famously articulated by Donald Rumsfeld. This, of course, presents an immediate paradox, because if you know that you don’t know that you don’t know something — which for you to be talking about unknown unknowns, you must, then this is a known unknown unknown, which I rather think — but to be clear, I don’t know, as such — must be a variety of known unknown. Which makes it an unknown known unknown unknown. Since I do know that I am not sure about this I can confidently, and with some relief, rest my case at a known unknown known unknown unknown. There are five types of known.

The Rumsfeld three:

And the Jolly Contrarian three:

See also