Why your job is safe: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|technology|[[File:Cricket prediction.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google a couple of years ago]] | {{a|technology|[[File:Cricket prediction.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google a couple of years ago]] | ||
[[File:Cricket prediction 2.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google yesterday]] | [[File:Cricket prediction 2.png|450px|thumb|center|A likely sporting outcome according to Google yesterday]] | ||
[[File:Goldman football predicition.png|450px|thumb|left|Goldman predicted this:]] | |||
[[File:Actual football outcome.png|450px|thumb|left|We actually got this:]] | |||
}}An occasional running series intended to pose the question: when will Adam Curtis’ assertion that the vaunted predictive power of big data is a “modern ghost story”. | }}An occasional running series intended to pose the question: when will Adam Curtis’ assertion that the vaunted predictive power of big data is a “modern ghost story”. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
*Android voice recognition interprets “Richard Strauss” as “Richard’s trouser”. | *Android voice recognition interprets “Richard Strauss” as “Richard’s trouser”. | ||
*Those splendid data-wizard brianboxes at Goldman Sachs can get their predictions this wrong: | *Those splendid data-wizard brianboxes at Goldman Sachs can get their predictions this wrong: | ||
*Long term, [[technology is a leveller]] and not a provider of competitive advantage | *Long term, [[technology is a leveller]] and not a provider of competitive advantage | ||
{{sa}} | {{sa}} | ||
*[[Artificial intelligence]] | *[[Artificial intelligence]] | ||
Revision as of 08:05, 12 July 2021
|
The JC pontificates about technology
An occasional series.
|
An occasional running series intended to pose the question: when will Adam Curtis’ assertion that the vaunted predictive power of big data is a “modern ghost story”.
Your job is safe as long as:
- Google thinks that ==> is a sensible win prediction for a cricket match.
- Microsoft’s auto-correct for bhusiness suggests “bushiness” but not “business”.
- Android voice recognition interprets “Richard Strauss” as “Richard’s trouser”.
- Those splendid data-wizard brianboxes at Goldman Sachs can get their predictions this wrong:
- Long term, technology is a leveller and not a provider of competitive advantage