You have read and understood these terms: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{pe}}It’s great isn’t it? Can you just imagine the turtle you’d be looking under to prove this one? :''Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C''.: M’lud, we have conclusive e...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pe}}It’s great isn’t it? Can you just imagine the turtle you’d be looking under to prove this one?
{{pe}}It’s great isn’t it? Can you just imagine the turtle you’d be looking under to prove this one?


:''Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C''.: M’lud, we have conclusive evidence that the defendant knew of this disclaimer, rendered I might add in [[caps lock|FULL CAPITALS]] on page 346 of the presentation.
:''Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C''.: M’lud, we have conclusive evidence that the defendant knew of this disclaimer, rendered I might add in [[CAPS LOCK|FULL CAPITALS]] on page 346 of the presentation.
:''Defendant'': No I didn't.
:''Defendant'': No I didn't.
:''Lord Justice Cockle-Carrot M.R.'': Didn't you?
:''Lord Justice Cockle-Carrot M.R.'': Didn't you?

Revision as of 18:17, 15 October 2019

Towards more picturesque speech™


Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Requests? Insults? We’d love to 📧 hear from you.
Sign up for our newsletter.

It’s great isn’t it? Can you just imagine the turtle you’d be looking under to prove this one?

Sir Jerrold Baxter-Morley, Q.C.: M’lud, we have conclusive evidence that the defendant knew of this disclaimer, rendered I might add in FULL CAPITALS on page 346 of the presentation.
Defendant: No I didn't.
Lord Justice Cockle-Carrot M.R.: Didn't you?
Defendant. No, sir. I didn't read it!
Sir Jerrold: BUT IT SAYS HERE “I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THESE TERMS”!
Defendant: Yes, but I didn't read that either.
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=You_have_read_and_understood_these_terms&oldid=33716"