Eligible counterparty - FCA Rulebook Term

From The Jolly Contrarian
Revision as of 09:47, 3 December 2024 by Amwelladmin (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The JC’s Reg and Leg resource™
UK Edition
COBS 3.6.2 - Per se eligible counterparties

Each of the following is a per se eligible counterparty (including an entity that is not from an EEA state that is equivalent to any of the following) unless and to the extent it is given a different categorisation under this chapter:

(1) an investment firm;
(2) a credit institution;
(3) an insurance company;
(4) a collective investment scheme authorised under the UCITS Directive or its management company;
(5) a pension fund or its management company;
(6) another financial institution authorised or regulated under EU legislation or the national law of an EEA State;
(7) an undertaking exempted from the application of MiFID under either Article 2(1)(k) (certain own account dealers in commodities or commodity derivatives) or Article 2(1)(l) (locals) of that directive;
(8) a national government or its corresponding office, including a public body that deals with the public debt;
(9) a central bank;
(10) a supranational organisation.
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

Either a per se eligible counterparty, or an elective eligible counterparty.

Per se ECP

To be compared and contrasted with elective eligible counterparty. These matter greatly when categorising clients for MiFID purposes, particularly in the context of best execution.

Elective ECP

The famous “elective ECP” categorisation: