There is no data from the future
|
|
Something that should be so utterly obvious it need not be said, but which nevertheless forms the backbone of the most common disclaimer on the planet. That we know only what we know, and do not know what happens next, is a lesson that should have been beaten into us, with fables such as the scientific turkey who, reasoning by induction alone, looks forward the farmer’s visit at breakfast each morning and gets quite the surprise come Christmas; the jointed pendulum whose trajectory, despite being a heavily constrained simple system, is quite impossible predict beyond about two swings; and the disastrous history of the financial markets.
But yet we persist in believing the past is a conditioning guide to the future. The cult of big data is, on this view, a reductionist autistic fantasy cherished by those who labour under the illusion — delusion, really — that, rather than just looking up and paying attention, we are better to manage the onrushing future by turning backward and extrapolating it from the past.
Of course, data is excellent for post hoc inferential reasoning — explaining after the fact why something no-one expected to happen before the fact, in fact, did — this is the research programme of evolution, in a nutshell — but we should not be deluded seduced into projecting that excellent rationalising power into the unknown darkness ahead. The past is a different country.