Failure to Pay, DUST and Cross Default under the ISDA: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "For those who think it is useful to understand the interaction between {{isdaprov|Failure to Pay}}, {{isdaprov|DUST}} and {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}. *'''{{isdaprov|FTP}}'''..."
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
For those who think it is useful to understand the interaction between {{isdaprov|Failure to Pay}}, {{isdaprov|DUST}} and {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}.
{{anat|isda}}For those who think it is useful to understand the interaction between {{isdaprov|Failure to Pay}}, {{isdaprov|DUST}} and {{isdaprov|Cross Default}}. Generally, the risks get bucketed into three:
#That you default ona transaction ''under this actual {{isdama}};''
#That you default under any analogous transaction with me under a different master trading agreement;
#That you default under a transaction with someone else in the world, the implications of that default being so heinous it should entitle me to terminate the risk I have under my transactions with you.


*'''{{isdaprov|FTP}}''' covers payment under delivery defaults directly under the {{isdama}}
*'''{{isdaprov|FTP}}''' covers payment under delivery defaults directly under the {{isdama}}. Obviously straightforward. You don't need any special cross-termination rights here.
*'''{{isdaprov|DUST}}''' covers trades under other master trading agreements (and distinct {{isdama}}s — unlikely, but not impossible) ''between the same two parties''
*'''{{isdaprov|DUST}}''' covers default under transactions governed by ''other'' master trading agreements (and distinct {{isdama}}s — unlikely, but not impossible) ''between the two of us''.
*'''{{isdaprov|Cross Default}}''' covers Specified Indebtedness (unless you’re odd, that means [[borrowed money]]) between the counterparty and any third party.
*'''{{isdaprov|Cross Default}}''' covers defaults under “{{isdaprov|Specified Indebtedness}}” (unless you’re odd, that just means normal indebtedness, or [[borrowed money]]) between the [[counterparty]] and any [[third party]], provided the default is so material (by reference to a {{isdaprov|Threshold}}) that it casts doubt on the counterparty’s ongoing viability (and hence its ability to perform its obligations to me uinder the {{isdama}}).
 
{{isdaprov|Failure to Pay}} and {{isdaprov|DUST}} are meant to be mutually exclusive by reference to ''governing agreement'' ({{isdaprov|FTP}} is stuff under this specific {{isdama}} right here, {{isdaprov|DUST}} being stuff under any ''other'' master trading agreement). {{isdaprov|DUST}} and {{isdaprov|Cross Default}} are meant to be mutually exclusive by reference to ''contract type'' ({{isdaprov|Specified Transactions}} under master trading agreements tend not to be “funded” and thus are not, by design, contracts of [[indebtedness]], especially in these times of mandatory collateralisation). This does not stop well-meaning but ignorant risk teams expanding Cross-Default to cover obligations that are not in the nature of indebtedness

Latest revision as of 16:31, 11 August 2017

ISDA Anatomy™

{{{2}}}

Index: Click to expand:Navigation
See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA.
The Varieties of ISDA Experience
Subject 2002 (wikitext) 1992 (wikitext) 1987 (wikitext)
Preamble Pre Pre Pre
Interpretation 1 1 1
Obligns/Payment 2 2 2
Representations 3 3 3
Agreements 4 4 4
EODs & Term Events 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityFMTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSTCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUMATE 5 Events of Default: FTPDBreachCSDMisrepDUSSCross DefaultBankruptcyMWA Termination Events: IllegalityTax EventTEUMCEUM
Early Termination 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculations; Payment DatePayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ETSet-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EODET right on TEEffect of DesignationCalculationsPayments on ET
Transfer 7 7 7
Contractual Currency 8 8 8
Miscellaneous 9 9 9
Offices; Multibranch Parties 10 10 10
Expenses 11 11 11
Notices 12 12 12
Governing Law 13 13 13
Definitions 14 14 14
Schedule Schedule Schedule Schedule
Termination Provisions Part 1 Part 1 Part 1
Tax Representations Part 2 Part 2 Part 2
Documents for Delivery Part 3 Part 3 Part 3
Miscellaneous Part 4 Part 4 Part 4
Other Provisions Part 5 Part 5 Part 5
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

For those who think it is useful to understand the interaction between Failure to Pay, DUST and Cross Default. Generally, the risks get bucketed into three:

  1. That you default ona transaction under this actual ISDA Master Agreement;
  2. That you default under any analogous transaction with me under a different master trading agreement;
  3. That you default under a transaction with someone else in the world, the implications of that default being so heinous it should entitle me to terminate the risk I have under my transactions with you.

Failure to Pay and DUST are meant to be mutually exclusive by reference to governing agreement (FTP is stuff under this specific ISDA Master Agreement right here, DUST being stuff under any other master trading agreement). DUST and Cross Default are meant to be mutually exclusive by reference to contract type (Specified Transactions under master trading agreements tend not to be “funded” and thus are not, by design, contracts of indebtedness, especially in these times of mandatory collateralisation). This does not stop well-meaning but ignorant risk teams expanding Cross-Default to cover obligations that are not in the nature of indebtedness