UCITS V: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{anat|ucits}} | |||
{{tag|UCITS V}} is the most recent iteration of the {{tag|UCITS}} directive, and can be found at {{eudirective|2014|91|EU}}. Has specific implications for {{tag|Depositaries}} and their {{tag|sub-custodian}}s (known in the legistlation as "delegates"). Much of this was prompted by Madoff. | {{tag|UCITS V}} is the most recent iteration of the {{tag|UCITS}} directive, and can be found at {{eudirective|2014|91|EU}}. Has specific implications for {{tag|Depositaries}} and their {{tag|sub-custodian}}s (known in the legistlation as "delegates"). Much of this was prompted by Madoff. | ||
Revision as of 17:53, 24 August 2017
|
UCITS Anatomy™
{{{2}}}
|
UCITS V is the most recent iteration of the UCITS directive, and can be found at 2014/91/EU (EUR Lex). Has specific implications for Depositaries and their sub-custodians (known in the legistlation as "delegates"). Much of this was prompted by Madoff.
Here's from an official EU idiot's guide to the legislation:
The Problem
There were 3 problems with existing UCITS legislation:
- Legal protection for UCITS investors varies too much among countries.
- UCITS assets are held by a depositary which also checks the fund manager's activities (e.g. compliance with investment strategy). There were only vague requirements on the depositary and its liability towards investors when things go wrong. These requirements were interpreted differently across Europe, so investors don't always have the same standards of protection.
- Different countries tended to take different approaches to penalising fund managers or depositaries.
- It had not kept up with the complexity of investment techniques and instruments.
- It allowed inappropriate pay policies for fund managers, which lead to excessive risk-taking.
The solution
Detailed, comprehensive rules on depositaries' tasks that would establish:
- Which assets the depositary must hold directly, what it must do with them and what it should do for assets that can't be held this way.
- how and when depositaries can delegate activities to sub-custodians, and their residual liability where they have done so;
- Depositary's obligations assets held by the depositary are lost: the depositary must replace them as soon as possible with assets of the same type or value (unless this is due to an external event beyond its control).
- Comprehensive rules on pay policies.
- minimum penalties across europe to be used when UCITS, their managers or depositaries breach key requirements.
See also
UCITS Anatomy
This is an article about undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities directive (UCITS).
Resources: UCITS IV (2009/65/EC (EUR Lex)) | UCITS V (2014/91/EU (EUR Lex)) | ESMA Guidance on UCITS | Depositary comparison under AIFMD and UCITS
Navigation - UCITS IV: 50(1)(g) Financial derivative instruments
Navigation - UCITS V: 22(2) Written contract with depositary | 22(3) (subscriptions, redemptions, valuation by depositary) | 22(4) (cash monitoring | 22(5) (safekeeping by depositary) | 22(7) (no reuse of assets by depositary) | 22a (delegation of depositary functions)
Anatomy™: AIFMD | CASS | COBS | Conference calls | Confis | CRR | CSA | EMIR | Equity Derivatives | FOA PCA | FUND | GMRA | GMSLA | ISDA | OSLA | PB | Swapclear | UCITS