Loss of Stock Borrow - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{eqderivanat|12.9(a)(vii)}} | {{eqderivanat|12.9(a)(vii)}}{{eqderivanat|12.9(b)(iv)}}{{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}} is an {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Event}} in the {{2002equitydefs}}, and is fondly abbreviated, by this commentator at least, to {{eqderivprov|LOSB}}. It pairs nicely with an {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}, fish or chicken. See also {{eqderivprov|12.9(b)(vii)}} which deals with the tension between {{eqderivprov|LOSB}} and {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}}. | ||
{{eqderivanat|12.9(b)(iv)}} | |||
{{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}} is an {{eqderivprov|Additional Disruption Event}} in the {{2002equitydefs}}, and is fondly abbreviated, by this commentator at least, to {{eqderivprov|LOSB}}. It pairs nicely with an {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}, fish or chicken. See also {{eqderivprov|12.9(b)(vii)}} which deals with the tension between {{eqderivprov|LOSB}} and {{eqderivprov|Hedging Disruption}}. | |||
*Where the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} can’t locate a stock borrow, the {{eqderivprov|Non-Hedging Party}} has the option to source one that is struck at less than the {{eqderivprov|Maximum Stock Loan Rate}} within two {{eqderivprov|Scheduled Trading Days}}, failing which the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} can terminate the {{eqderivprov|Transaction}}. | *Where the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} can’t locate a stock borrow, the {{eqderivprov|Non-Hedging Party}} has the option to source one that is struck at less than the {{eqderivprov|Maximum Stock Loan Rate}} within two {{eqderivprov|Scheduled Trading Days}}, failing which the {{eqderivprov|Hedging Party}} can terminate the {{eqderivprov|Transaction}}. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 7: | ||
'''Compare and contrast''' with {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}. There is a logical handoff and interaction between the two. | '''Compare and contrast''' with {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}. There is a logical handoff and interaction between the two. | ||
*If the cost of a stock borrow exceeds the {{eqderivprov|Maximum Stock Loan Rate}} it is deemed to be (as good as) impossible to borrow stock, so it is treated as a {{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}}, not merely an {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}. If a counterparty wants to apply Increased Cost of Stock Borrow whatever the cost of an available bid, the answer is to disapply {{eqderivprov|Maximum Stock Loan Rate}} altogether. This means that ''any'' possible stock borrow rate, however astronomical, comes under {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}, and {{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}} (which is slightly more onerous a termination right) only applies where there are no offers in the market at all. | *If the cost of a stock borrow exceeds the {{eqderivprov|Maximum Stock Loan Rate}} it is deemed to be (as good as) impossible to borrow stock, so it is treated as a {{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}}, not merely an {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}. If a counterparty wants to apply Increased Cost of Stock Borrow whatever the cost of an available bid, the answer is to disapply {{eqderivprov|Maximum Stock Loan Rate}} altogether. This means that ''any'' possible stock borrow rate, however astronomical, comes under {{eqderivprov|Increased Cost of Stock Borrow}}, and {{eqderivprov|Loss of Stock Borrow}} (which is slightly more onerous a termination right) only applies where there are no offers in the market at all. | ||
{{seealso}} | |||
*{{eqderivprov|Triple cocktail}} | |||
Revision as of 15:23, 10 January 2019
Template:EqderivanatTemplate:EqderivanatLoss of Stock Borrow is an Additional Disruption Event in the 2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions, and is fondly abbreviated, by this commentator at least, to LOSB. It pairs nicely with an Increased Cost of Stock Borrow, fish or chicken. See also 12.9(b)(vii) which deals with the tension between LOSB and Hedging Disruption.
- Where the Hedging Party can’t locate a stock borrow, the Non-Hedging Party has the option to source one that is struck at less than the Maximum Stock Loan Rate within two Scheduled Trading Days, failing which the Hedging Party can terminate the Transaction.
- Where LOSB and Hedging Disruption both apply and the same event could qualify as either, it will be treated as a LOSB (which has milder consequences for the affected party).
- Synthetic PB: For synthetic prime brokerage, it is common for the PB to pass on its stock borrowing costs (well: it is a synthetic equivalent of a stock borrow and a short sale, after all, so this makes sense). It does this by subtracting the prevailing borrow rate from the floating rate it pays under the swap. Therefore the Non-Hedging Party wears the ultimate cost of the expensive stock borrow, so there’s no real need to impose a Maximum Stock Loan Rate (though prime brokers will typically impose one as a matter of course).
Compare and contrast with Increased Cost of Stock Borrow. There is a logical handoff and interaction between the two.
- If the cost of a stock borrow exceeds the Maximum Stock Loan Rate it is deemed to be (as good as) impossible to borrow stock, so it is treated as a Loss of Stock Borrow, not merely an Increased Cost of Stock Borrow. If a counterparty wants to apply Increased Cost of Stock Borrow whatever the cost of an available bid, the answer is to disapply Maximum Stock Loan Rate altogether. This means that any possible stock borrow rate, however astronomical, comes under Increased Cost of Stock Borrow, and Loss of Stock Borrow (which is slightly more onerous a termination right) only applies where there are no offers in the market at all.