Template:Barnacles: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "{{a|negotiation|}}Over time contract templates will inevitably accumulate what I call “barnacles” — ''ad hoc'' responses to historic situations, anecdotal r...")
 
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|negotiation|}}Over time contract templates will inevitably accumulate what I call “[[barnacle|barnacles]]” — ''ad hoc'' responses to historic situations, anecdotal reactions to unexpected risks, [[flannel]]esque flourishes to placate a truculent or obtuse counterparty. If your client insists on redundant (or misconceived) terms (“[[for the avoidance of doubt]]”; “[[without limitation]]” — that kind of thing) the pragmatic response is to agree them and move toward execution.  
Over time contract templates will inevitably accumulate what I call “[[barnacle|barnacles]]” — ''ad hoc'' responses to historic situations, anecdotal reactions to unexpected risks, [[flannel]]esque flourishes to placate a truculent, obtuse or just downright [[Who’s Queen|''stubborn'' counterparty]] — no-one likes them, but if your client insists on redundant (or misconceived) terms (“[[for the avoidance of doubt]]”; “[[without limitation]]”; “because it is our [[policy]] to require them” — that kind of thing) for the [[Negotiator|sort of fellow]] who prefers a short-term fix over long-term existential satisfaction, the pragmatic response is to agree them and move toward execution.  


These [[barnacles]] have a habit of finding their way into, and encrusting, negotiation templates. And, as people move on, their original justification — if there even was one — becomes lost to time. The instinct of successive [[risk controller|risk controllers]] upon encountering them will be, “I don't know why that is there, but whoever put it in must have had a reason<ref>Not necessarily so. Just as likely to be miscoonception. As to which, see [[indemnity]].</ref>, so the safest thing is to leave it there.”  
These [[barnacles]] have a habit of finding their way into, and encrusting, [[negotiation]] templates. And, as people move on, their original justification — if there even was one — becomes lost to time. The instinct of successive [[risk controller|risk controllers]], short an option as they are, upon encountering them will be, “I don’t know why that is there, but whoever put it in must have had a reason for doing that,<ref>Not necessarily so. Just as likely to be a misconception. As to which, see [[indemnity]].</ref> so the safest thing is to leave it there.”  


This will lead to complexity in templates, additional length of templates and a proliferation of different templates. <br>
This will lead ''more [[complicated]]'' templates, ''longer'' templates and a proliferation of ''different'' templates. <br>