Template:Confi basic structure: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Basic structure of a [[confidentiality agreement]]===
===What ''should'' be in an [[NDA]]===
1. '''Who is who''': who is disclosing and who is receiving, or is it mutual? <br>
Let’s be blunt about this: there is a special place in hell for [[legal eagle|any advisor]] who serves up a confidentiality agreement more than 3 pages long. Even three pages is purgatorially tedious. GET TO THE POINT. It’s a goddamn [[NDA]], not the sale of your soul.
2. '''The {{confiprov|Confidential information}}: what is it?'''<br>
 
:(a) What generally counts as {{confiprov|confidential information}}?
For those of you who can’t see your way clear to embracing the [[OneNDA]], and who have not yet been asked to [[get your coat]], here are the basic things it needs to cover:
:(b) What is excluded from that general definition?
'''Who is who''': Who is disclosing, who is receiving, or is it mutual? Mutual is good — as it plays to the idea that this is fair, but sometimes you want to just get across the line quickly, by offering confidentiality, without requiring it. That way, for example, you can just sign without seeking ''assent''. <br>
3. '''{{confiprov|Purpose}}: What is the purpose of disclosing the {{confiprov|confidential information}}?'''<br>
*'''The confidential information''': What counts as {{confiprov|confidential information}}, and what doesn’t? <br>
4. '''{{confiprov|Recipient}}s: who is allowed access to the {{confiprov|confidential information}}'''? <br>
*'''The Purpose''': ''Why'' are you disclosing the {{confiprov|confidential information}}? What is the [[project]]? <br>
:(a) Which of the {{confiprov|recipient}}’s personnel can access the {{confiprov|confidential information}}?
*'''The confidentiality obligation itself''': How is the receiver expected to keep it secret? Who can the receiver share with? On what terms? <br>
:(a) Are there any external personnel with whom the {{confiprov|recipient}} can share {{confiprov|confidential information}}?
*'''Mandatory disclosure beyond the “Purpose”''': What about compulsory disclosure under legal process, statutes and regulations?<br>
5. '''The {{confiprov|confidentiality undertaking}} itself''' <br>
*'''Term''': How long does the confidentiality obligation last?<br>
:(a) To keep the {{confiprov|confidential information}} confidential; ,maintain appropriate information barriers etc.
*'''Other''': Representations and warranties, governing law, And for God’s sake WHATEVER YOU DO DON’T FORGET THE [[Counterparts|COUNTERPARTS]] CLAUSE.
:(b) To use it only for the permitted {{confiprov|purpose}}
===What ''shouldn’t'' be in an NDA===
:(c) Return or destroy confidential information at the end of the project
The following often make their way into a confi agreement, though none really have any business being there.
6. '''Under what circumstances can the {{confiprov|recipient}} disclose {{confiprov|confidential information}}, and to whom, beyond the {{confiprov|purpose}}?
*An [[exclusivity clause]]
:(a) Regulator’s requests
*A [[non-solicitation clause]]
:(b) During dispute resolution processes
*An [[indemnity]]
7. '''Term of the confidentiality obligation'''<br>
8. '''General''' <br>
:(a) What {{confiprov|representations}} does the discloser make?
:(b) What {{confiprov|acknowledgments}} does the recipient make?
:(c) [[Governing law]]

Latest revision as of 09:22, 17 September 2021

What should be in an NDA

Let’s be blunt about this: there is a special place in hell for any advisor who serves up a confidentiality agreement more than 3 pages long. Even three pages is purgatorially tedious. GET TO THE POINT. It’s a goddamn NDA, not the sale of your soul.

For those of you who can’t see your way clear to embracing the OneNDA, and who have not yet been asked to get your coat, here are the basic things it needs to cover: Who is who: Who is disclosing, who is receiving, or is it mutual? Mutual is good — as it plays to the idea that this is fair, but sometimes you want to just get across the line quickly, by offering confidentiality, without requiring it. That way, for example, you can just sign without seeking assent.

  • The confidential information: What counts as confidential information, and what doesn’t?
  • The Purpose: Why are you disclosing the confidential information? What is the project?
  • The confidentiality obligation itself: How is the receiver expected to keep it secret? Who can the receiver share with? On what terms?
  • Mandatory disclosure beyond the “Purpose”: What about compulsory disclosure under legal process, statutes and regulations?
  • Term: How long does the confidentiality obligation last?
  • Other: Representations and warranties, governing law, And for God’s sake WHATEVER YOU DO DON’T FORGET THE COUNTERPARTS CLAUSE.

What shouldn’t be in an NDA

The following often make their way into a confi agreement, though none really have any business being there.