Template:M summ EUA Annex (d)(vi): Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Requirements under the Scheme - Emissions Annex Provision|Some]] of the more dismal drafting — outwardly innocuous, not having that “see if you can get through this tract without lashing out at nearby loved ones” vibe that characterises, say the [[regulatory initial margin]] credit support deed — but just lazy, fearful wordsmithing all the same, in a workaday provision, that should be uncontentious enough to invite unfussy, direct drafting. | [[Requirements under the Scheme - Emissions Annex Provision|Some]] of the more dismal drafting — outwardly innocuous, not having that “see if you can get through this tract without lashing out at nearby loved ones” vibe that characterises, say the [[regulatory initial margin]] credit support deed — but just lazy, fearful wordsmithing all the same, in a workaday provision, that should be uncontentious enough to invite unfussy, direct drafting. | ||
For one thing, a {{euaprov|Delayed Delivery Date}} is a sub-category of {{euaprov|Delivery Date}}, so when you have said the latter you necessarily include the former: there is no need for that “{{euaprov|Delivery Date}} or {{euaprov|Delayed Delivery Date}} ([[as the case may be]])” nonsense. Indeed, logically, one ''never'' needs to say, | For one thing, a {{euaprov|Delayed Delivery Date}} is a sub-category of {{euaprov|Delivery Date}}, so when you have said the latter you necessarily include the former: there is no need for that “{{euaprov|Delivery Date}} or {{euaprov|Delayed Delivery Date}} ([[as the case may be]])” nonsense. Indeed, logically, one ''never'' needs to say, “[[as the case may be]]”: if the case ''isn’t'', then it isn’t; if it ''is'' then it is. This puff of [[celery]] does nothing to advance matters. | ||
===What does this do?=== | ===What does this do?=== | ||
This simply asks parties to an Emissions Transaction to make sure they have the necessary | This simply asks parties to an Emissions Transaction to make sure they have the necessary {{euaprov|Holding Account}}s — a “{{euaprov|Specified Holding Account}}” is just the {{euaprov|Holding Account}} you have specified in your {{isdaprov|Confirmation}}, so thanks for that one, [[’squad|gang]] — set up in the {{euaprov|Union Registry}} and correctly configured so they can efficiently perform their settlement obligations. Have an account, add your counterparty’s account to your trusted list, and don’t behave like such a berk that you get thrown out of the system, or have transfers to and from your account frozen. | ||
===Knock on impacts=== | ===Knock on impacts=== | ||
Note a failure to deliver by a Delivering Party won’t count as a formal {{euaprov|Failure to Deliver}} if brought about because the {{euaprov|Receiving Party}} has forgotten to set up a {{euaprov|Holding Account}}, not added the {{euaprov|Delivering Party}}’s {{euaprov|Holding Account}} to its trusted account list, or generally behaved like such a berk that it gets thrown out of the system, | Note a failure to deliver by a Delivering Party won’t count as a formal {{euaprov|Failure to Deliver}} if brought about because the {{euaprov|Receiving Party}} has forgotten to set up a {{euaprov|Holding Account}}, not added the {{euaprov|Delivering Party}}’s {{euaprov|Holding Account}} to its trusted account list, or generally behaved like such a berk that it gets thrown out of the system, or has its own account frozen. | ||
Latest revision as of 09:01, 19 July 2022
ISDA’s crack drafting squad™ to the max
Some of the more dismal drafting — outwardly innocuous, not having that “see if you can get through this tract without lashing out at nearby loved ones” vibe that characterises, say the regulatory initial margin credit support deed — but just lazy, fearful wordsmithing all the same, in a workaday provision, that should be uncontentious enough to invite unfussy, direct drafting.
For one thing, a Delayed Delivery Date is a sub-category of Delivery Date, so when you have said the latter you necessarily include the former: there is no need for that “Delivery Date or Delayed Delivery Date (as the case may be)” nonsense. Indeed, logically, one never needs to say, “as the case may be”: if the case isn’t, then it isn’t; if it is then it is. This puff of celery does nothing to advance matters.
What does this do?
This simply asks parties to an Emissions Transaction to make sure they have the necessary Holding Accounts — a “Specified Holding Account” is just the Holding Account you have specified in your Confirmation, so thanks for that one, gang — set up in the Union Registry and correctly configured so they can efficiently perform their settlement obligations. Have an account, add your counterparty’s account to your trusted list, and don’t behave like such a berk that you get thrown out of the system, or have transfers to and from your account frozen.
Knock on impacts
Note a failure to deliver by a Delivering Party won’t count as a formal Failure to Deliver if brought about because the Receiving Party has forgotten to set up a Holding Account, not added the Delivering Party’s Holding Account to its trusted account list, or generally behaved like such a berk that it gets thrown out of the system, or has its own account frozen.