Shareholder: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{a|g|{{image|Shareholders|jpg|The [[hive | {{a|g|{{image|Shareholders|jpg|The [[hive mind]]’s conceptualisation of some shareholders, yesterday.}} }}The holder for the time being of a [[share]] in the equity of a company; a part owner of a corporate enterprise. Usually, shares are issued in [[registered form]] (as opposed to [[bearer security|bearer]] form), because it is sort of important to know who — you know — ''owns the goddamn company''. Whereas your [[creditors]], on the other hand — could you really give a fig about them? Well, obviously you ''could'', but as a general category, when you have issued that ''indebtedness'' in the form of [[Bearer instrument|freely transferable]] [[debt securities]], it is mainly that fact that ''someone'' (other than you)<ref>If it ''does'' happen to be you, then we should raise a glass, by the way, to whomsoever was the wizard who thought up [[Debt value adjustment|debt value adjustments]], allowing a near-bankrupt bank to book a profit off the discounted price at which it might buy its own paper back in the market, to massage its profit and loss statement in a particularly oily year.</ref> holds them that concerns you, rather than precisely ''who''. | ||
How ''important'' the shareholder is — and should be — in the grander scheme of things, is the topic of a JC essay, [[Stakeholder capitalism|here]]. | How ''important'' the shareholder is — and should be — in the grander scheme of things, is the topic of a JC essay, [[Stakeholder capitalism|here]]. |
Latest revision as of 20:38, 10 January 2023
|
The holder for the time being of a share in the equity of a company; a part owner of a corporate enterprise. Usually, shares are issued in registered form (as opposed to bearer form), because it is sort of important to know who — you know — owns the goddamn company. Whereas your creditors, on the other hand — could you really give a fig about them? Well, obviously you could, but as a general category, when you have issued that indebtedness in the form of freely transferable debt securities, it is mainly that fact that someone (other than you)[1] holds them that concerns you, rather than precisely who.
How important the shareholder is — and should be — in the grander scheme of things, is the topic of a JC essay, here.
See also
References
- ↑ If it does happen to be you, then we should raise a glass, by the way, to whomsoever was the wizard who thought up debt value adjustments, allowing a near-bankrupt bank to book a profit off the discounted price at which it might buy its own paper back in the market, to massage its profit and loss statement in a particularly oily year.