Hedging Disruption - Equity Derivatives Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(28 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{eqdmanual|12.9(a)(v)}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:21, 13 October 2023
2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™
12.9(a)(v) in all its glory
Resources and Navigation |
Overview
This is what counts as a Hedging Disruption. To find out what happens when you have a Hedging Disruption, see the Consequences of Hedging Disruption at Section 12.9(b)(iii).
Summary
It isn’t brilliantly worded, but the spirit is clear: it is not just that your particular hedge that you actually had on went kaput, but that you could find any reasonably suitable replacement for it. You can’t be picky. Okay, the equities market might be locked up, but what about futures? I grant you, if the underlying market is disrupted, it’s likely the listed futures market will be too, but you never know. How about ADRs or GDRs?
Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics 👇
|
- The JC’s famous Nutshell™ summary of this clause
- What of informal action by a regulator?
- The bogus “why should I pay your hedging costs? I have no control over them” argument
- Commentary on other pernickety amendments