Legaltech entrepreneur: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{a|people|}}A former managing associate from ''Latham & Watkins'' who, tiring of proof-reading [[confidentiality agreement]]s at 2:30 am, has realised there must be a better way of earning a living — this much is certainly true — and has concluded that it will be by designing some software than can do that job instead. So, armed with some ropey javascript commissioned from [[School-leaver from Bucharest|a “developer” from Bucharest]] on the dark web, she has embarked on a glorious new business career as an aspiring new Mark Zuckerberg.
{{a|people|
{{image|Snake-Oil-Salesman|jpg|See? Signed by [[Bitcoin|Satoshi Nakamoto]].}}
}}A former managing associate from ''Latham & Watkins'' who, tiring of proof-reading [[confidentiality agreement]]s at 2:30 am, has realised there must be a better way of earning a living — this much is certainly true — and has concluded that it will be by designing some software than can do that job instead. So, armed with some ropey javascript commissioned from [[School-leaver from Bucharest|a “developer” in Bucharest]] she found on “the dark web”,<ref>I.e., Firefox in incognito mode.</ref> she has embarked on a glorious new business career as a “[[vendor]]”.


This is a smart idea because:  
This is a smart idea because:  
:(a) it is ''very'' easy to impress a [[general counsel]] with any technology more sophisticated than a pop-up toaster — all you do is say, “it runs on blockchain”;
:(a) it is ''very'' easy to impress a [[general counsel]] with any [[technology]] more sophisticated than a pop-up toaster — all she does is say, “it runs on [[blockchain]]”;
:(b) the potential revenue, if you can sell your WordPress installation to any significant participant in the [[financial services]] industry is out of all proportion to the value the software could possibly deliver, but this doesn’t matter as long as the [[RAG indicator]] on the [[GC]]’s management committee report is green and the [[general counsel]] thinks it runs on [[blockchain]], since it will be the lawyers who will get blamed when it turns not to work very well;  
:(b) the potential revenue, if she can sell her WordPress installation to any significant participant in the [[financial services]] industry is out of all proportion to the value the software could possibly deliver, but this doesn’t matter as long as the [[general counsel]] thinks it runs on [[blockchain]] and the [[RAG status]] for innovation in the ManCo [[deck]] is therefore green, since it will be the poor lawyers who will get it in the neck when it turns out to be utterly useless;  
:(c) almost all [[reg tech]] is just as ropey, being either hastily cobbled PHP that runs on top of Google Docs; or hastily cobbled-together javascript that runs on top of a generic TensorFlow [[neural network]].
:(c) almost all [[legaltech]] is just as ropey, being either hastily cobbled PHP that runs on top of Google Docs; or hastily cobbled-together javascript that runs on top of a generic TensorFlow [[neural network]], so there is a level chance no-one will notice it won’t work anyway.


Before she can say, “[[software as a service]]” he’ll be rocking brush-cotton check shirts, living out of a ''WeWork'' broom cupboard in Shoreditch while angling for a place in Fuse and doing her own [[LinkedIn]] webcasts to the rapturous acclaim of ''other'' [[legaltech]] entrepreneurs.
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[LinkedIn job descriptions]]
*[[LinkedIn job descriptions]]
*[[Reg tech]]
*[[Legaltech landscape]]
*[[Software as a service]]
{{ref}}
{{nlp|12/2/2021}}

Latest revision as of 08:31, 12 July 2024

People Anatomy™
A spotter’s guide to the men and women of finance.


See? Signed by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A former managing associate from Latham & Watkins who, tiring of proof-reading confidentiality agreements at 2:30 am, has realised there must be a better way of earning a living — this much is certainly true — and has concluded that it will be by designing some software than can do that job instead. So, armed with some ropey javascript commissioned from a “developer” in Bucharest she found on “the dark web”,[1] she has embarked on a glorious new business career as a “vendor”.

This is a smart idea because:

(a) it is very easy to impress a general counsel with any technology more sophisticated than a pop-up toaster — all she does is say, “it runs on blockchain”;
(b) the potential revenue, if she can sell her WordPress installation to any significant participant in the financial services industry is out of all proportion to the value the software could possibly deliver, but this doesn’t matter as long as the general counsel thinks it runs on blockchain and the RAG status for innovation in the ManCo deck is therefore green, since it will be the poor lawyers who will get it in the neck when it turns out to be utterly useless;
(c) almost all legaltech is just as ropey, being either hastily cobbled PHP that runs on top of Google Docs; or hastily cobbled-together javascript that runs on top of a generic TensorFlow neural network, so there is a level chance no-one will notice it won’t work anyway.

Before she can say, “software as a service” he’ll be rocking brush-cotton check shirts, living out of a WeWork broom cupboard in Shoreditch while angling for a place in Fuse and doing her own LinkedIn webcasts to the rapturous acclaim of other legaltech entrepreneurs.

See also

References

  1. I.e., Firefox in incognito mode.