Capacity: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A good subject for a [[representation]], a bad one for a [[warranty]].
{{repanat|Capacity|
[[File:Dramatic Chipmunk.png|450px|thumb|center|DID SOMEONE SAY “ORANGE COUNTY”???]]
}}A good subject for a [[representation]], a bad one for a [[warranty]].


{{Capacity capsule}}
{{Capacity capsule}}
Now this presents issues if you will look to your {{t|contract}} to enforce this warranty. For if your client was without the [[capacity]] to enter into your {{t|contract}} — to be sure, for commercial enterprises in sensible jurisdictions, a vanishingly remote contingency these days, but it can happen if you ply your trade with [[local authorities]] — then its ''contractual'' warranty that it ''had'' that [[capacity]] doesn’t get off the launch pad: You have a [[chicken-licken]] and egg problem.


Now this presents issues if you will look to your [[contract]] to enforce this warranty. For if your client was without the [[capacity]] to enter into your [[contract]] then its ''contractual'' warranty that it ''had'' that [[capacity]] doesn’t get off the launch pad: You have a [[chicken-licken]] and egg problem.


{{Seealso}}
Often combined with the {{repprov|authority}} representation into a [[capacity and authority]] rep. But they’re quite different things, in this commentator’s pedantic view.
*{{tag|capacity and authority}}
 
{{SA}}
*[[capacity and authority]]
*[[Reps and warranties]]
*[[Reps and warranties]]
*[[ultra vires]]
*[[ultra vires]]
*[[authority]]
*[[authority]]

Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024

Representations and Warranties Anatomy™
DID SOMEONE SAY “ORANGE COUNTY”???


A “typical” Capacity clause:

Capacity: You have the capacity and all necessary powers to enter into this agreement and perform your obligations under it.

view template

Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

A good subject for a representation, a bad one for a warranty.

Whether your counterparty is even constitutionally capable of entering into obligations of the type contemplated by your contract, is a question of its capacity (as to which see also ultra vires). In this day and age, capacity — once a rich source of legal paranoia — is largely a dead letter among commercial enterprises in sensible jurisdictions, but it is still a banana skin for municipal bodies and local governments. Even thirty years on, the words “Orange County” or “Hammersmith and Fulham council” will be enough to get buttocks clenching in your risk department.

Now this presents issues if you will look to your contract to enforce this warranty. For if your client was without the capacity to enter into your contract then its contractual warranty that it had that capacity doesn’t get off the launch pad: You have a chicken-licken and egg problem.

Often combined with the authority representation into a capacity and authority rep. But they’re quite different things, in this commentator’s pedantic view.

Template:SA