|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{isdaanat|Termination Currency Equivalent|}} | | {{isdamanual|Termination Currency Equivalent}} |
| A fabulous example of the English language getting the better of a committee of its own seasoned professional users, [[ISDA]]’s remarkable “{{isdaprov|Termination Currency Equivalent}}” definition erodes the fabric in which the basic assumptions of people who share a common language are woven.
| |
| | |
| They have managed to convolute, to the point of incomprehensibility, a concept well enough described by its own name. Who would labour under a serious doubt about this expression:
| |
| :“one party must pay the other the amount in its ''termination currency equivalent''”?
| |
| Failing that, how about this:
| |
| :“one party must pay the other ''an equivalent amount in the termination currency''”?
| |
| | |
| The idea of an amount in one currency of an amount expressed in another really oughtn’t to be ''that'' hard to master, but to see how hard someone with [[profound ontological uncertainty]] can make it, have a gander at this ==>
| |
| | |
| ===User guide===
| |
| Here’s what the [[Encyclopaedia Galactica]] has to say about {{isdaprov|Termination Currency Equivalent}}:
| |
| | |
| :Under the {{2002isda}}, a payment on early termination will be made in the {{isdaprov|Termination Currency}}. The “Termination Currency” must be specified in Part 1(f) of the [[ISDA Schedule|Schedule]] to the {{2002isda}} and, if not specified or the currency specified is not freely available, the fallback will be U.S. dollar for a 2002 Agreement governed by [[New York]] law, and the [[euro]] if a {{2002isda}} is governed by English law. The 1992 Agreement had a U.S. dollar fallback regardless of the governing law of the {{1992isda}}. In calculating amounts payable, any {{isdaprov|Close-out Amount}} or {{isdaprov|Unpaid Amount}} is converted to a “Termination Currency Equivalent” on the basis of an exchange rate determined in accordance with the {{2002isda}} by a foreign exchange agent.
| |
Latest revision as of 09:38, 28 June 2023
|
2002 ISDA Master Agreement
A Jolly Contrarian owner’s manual™
Termination Currency Equivalent in a Nutshell™
|
The JC’s Nutshell™ summary of this term has moved uptown to the subscription-only ninja tier. For the cost of ½ a weekly 🍺 you can get it here. Sign up at Substack. You can even ask questions! Ask about it here.
|
Termination Currency Equivalent in all its glory
“ Termination Currency Equivalent” means, in respect of any amount denominated in the Termination Currency, such Termination Currency amount and, in respect of any amount denominated in a currency other than the Termination Currency (the “ Other Currency”), the amount in the Termination Currency determined by the party making the relevant determination as being required to purchase such amount of such Other Currency as at the relevant Early Termination Date, or, if the relevant Close-out Amount is determined as of a later date, that later date, with the Termination Currency at the rate equal to the spot exchange rate of the foreign exchange agent (selected as provided below) for the purchase of such Other Currency with the Termination Currency at or about 11:00 a.m. (in the city in which such foreign exchange agent is located) on such date as would be customary for the determination of such a rate for the purchase of such Other Currency for value on the relevant Early Termination Date or that later date. The foreign exchange agent will, if only one party is obliged to make a determination under Section 6(e), be selected in good faith by that party and otherwise will be agreed by the parties.
|
Related agreements and comparisons
Resources and Navigation
|
Overview
But for the edition-appropriate references to “Loss and Market Quotation (as the case may be)” for the 1992 ISDA, and Close-out Amount (for the 2002 ISDA, these definitions are identical.
Summary
A fabulous example of the English language getting the better of a committee of its own seasoned professional users, ISDA’s remarkable “Termination Currency Equivalent” definition erodes the fabric in which the basic assumptions of people who share a common language are woven.
It convolutes, to the point of incomprehensibility, an idea well enough described by its own name. Who would labour under a serious doubt about this expression:
- “one party must pay the other the amount in its termination currency equivalent”?
Failing that, how about this:
- “one party must pay the other an equivalent amount in the termination currency”?
The idea of an amount in one currency of an amount expressed in another really oughtn’t to be that hard to master, but to see how hard someone with profound ontological uncertainty can make it, have a gander at this ==>
Premium content
Here the free bit runs out. Subscribers click 👉 here. New readers sign up 👉 here and, for ½ a weekly 🍺 go full ninja about all these juicy topics 👇 |
- The JC’s famous Nutshell™ summary of this clause
- The Encyclopaedia Galactica’s entry on “Termination Currency Equivalent”
See also
References