Tax indemnity: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The best kind of [[indemnity]]. One of the few occasions where {{tag|contract}}ual indemnity is generally justified and reasonable — if an unexpected tax is imposed on one party in respect of its activity in providing a service (holding its assets in custody for example) for the other. It ticks all the boxes of a good indemnity: It is precise, specific and easy to articulate; it is hard to predict or cost into one’s service, it is deterministic in amount, and doesn’t open up the indemnifying person to indeterminate liability.
{{a|spb|}}The best kind of [[indemnity]]. One of the few occasions where [[contract]]ual [[indemnity]] is generally justified and reasonable — if an unexpected tax is imposed on one party in respect of its activity in providing a service (holding assets in [[custody]] for example) for the other. It ticks all the boxes of a good indemnity: It relates to liabilities one party incurs carrying out activity for which the other party (exclusively) benefits; it is precise, specific and easy to articulate; it is a genuine [[contingent liability|contingency]] in that it is hard to anticipate and therefore cost into one’s service; if it does come about, a tax amount is deterministic in amount, and doesn’t open up the [[Indemnifying party|indemnifying person]] to [[indeterminate liability]].
{{sa}}
{{sa}}
*[[Indemnity]]
*[[Indemnity]]
*[[Contingent liability]]

Latest revision as of 13:30, 14 August 2024

Synthetic Prime Brokerage Anatomy™
Synthetic prime brokerage is documented under the 2002 ISDA Equity Derivatives Definitions, so read this anatomy in conjunction with our wider Equity Derivatives Anatomy. See also our Prime Brokerage Anatomy.
Index: Click to expand:
Tell me more
Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

The best kind of indemnity. One of the few occasions where contractual indemnity is generally justified and reasonable — if an unexpected tax is imposed on one party in respect of its activity in providing a service (holding assets in custody for example) for the other. It ticks all the boxes of a good indemnity: It relates to liabilities one party incurs carrying out activity for which the other party (exclusively) benefits; it is precise, specific and easy to articulate; it is a genuine contingency in that it is hard to anticipate and therefore cost into one’s service; if it does come about, a tax amount is deterministic in amount, and doesn’t open up the indemnifying person to indeterminate liability.

See also