Template:M summ 1992 ISDA Unpaid Amounts: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
Created page with "You may want to know where {{isda92prov|Unpaid Amounts}} feature in the {{isdama}}. The answer: In {{isda92prov|Payments on Early Termination}}: Section {{isda92prov|6(e)(i)}}..."
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
You may want to know where {{isda92prov|Unpaid Amounts}} feature in the {{isdama}}. The answer: In {{isda92prov|Payments on Early Termination}}: Section {{isda92prov|6(e)(i)}} (for {{isda92prov|Events of Default}}) and {{isda92prov|6(e)(ii)}} (for {{isda92prov|Termination Events}}) and {{isda92prov|6(e)(iv)}} ({{isda92prov|Adjustment for Illegality or Force Majeure Event}}).
You may want to know where {{isda92prov|Unpaid Amounts}} feature in the {{isdama}}. The answer: In {{isda92prov|Payments on Early Termination}}: Section {{isda92prov|6(e)(i)}} (for {{isda92prov|Events of Default}}) and {{isda92prov|6(e)(ii)}} (for {{isda92prov|Termination Events}}).


Spoddy point for old-fashioned {{1992ma}} hipster types: if “{{isda92prov|Loss}}” is your chosen means of close-out valuation, the concept of {{isda92prov|Unpaid Amounts}} is more or less factored into the definition of {{isda92prov|Loss}}:
Spoddy point for old-fashioned {{1992ma}} hipster types: if “{{isda92prov|Loss}}” is your chosen means of close-out valuation, the concept of {{isda92prov|Unpaid Amounts}} is more or less factored into the definition of {{isda92prov|Loss}}:


:''{{isda92prov|Loss}} includes losses and costs (or gains) in respect of any payment or delivery required to have been made (assuming satisfaction of each applicable condition precedent) on or before the relevant Early Termination Date and not made, except, so as to avoid duplication, if Section {{isda92prov|6(e)(i)}}(1) or (3) or {{isda92prov|6(e)(ii)}}(2)(A) applies...''<ref>There is a magnificent piece of ISDA discombobulation here: Section {{isda92prov|6(e)(i)}}(1) and (3), and {{isda92prov|6(e)(ii)}}(2)(A), all deal exclusively with agreements where {{isda92prov|Market Quotation}}, and not {{isda92prov|Loss}}, applies. So there is, in fact, ''no'' risk of duplication, since the definition of {{isda92prov|Loss}} is entirely irrelevant to these parts of the agreement.</ref>
:''{{isda92prov|Loss}} includes losses and costs (or gains) in respect of any payment or delivery required to have been made (assuming satisfaction of each applicable condition precedent) on or before the relevant Early Termination Date and not made, except, so as to avoid duplication, if Section {{isda92prov|6(e)(i)}}(1) or (3) or {{isda92prov|6(e)(ii)}}(2)(A) applies...''
 
This is why the drafting of the {{csaprov|Default}} provision (paragraph {{csaprov|6}}) of the {{csa}} is as tortuous as it is. If you were wondering.

Latest revision as of 17:02, 17 March 2020

You may want to know where Unpaid Amounts feature in the ISDA Master Agreement. The answer: In Payments on Early Termination: Section 6(e)(i) (for Events of Default) and 6(e)(ii) (for Termination Events).

Spoddy point for old-fashioned 1992 ISDA hipster types: if “Loss” is your chosen means of close-out valuation, the concept of Unpaid Amounts is more or less factored into the definition of Loss:

Loss includes losses and costs (or gains) in respect of any payment or delivery required to have been made (assuming satisfaction of each applicable condition precedent) on or before the relevant Early Termination Date and not made, except, so as to avoid duplication, if Section 6(e)(i)(1) or (3) or 6(e)(ii)(2)(A) applies...
Retrieved from "https://jollycontrarian.com/index.php?title=Template:M_summ_1992_ISDA_Unpaid_Amounts&oldid=41603"