Passive: Difference between revisions

From The Jolly Contrarian
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
A voice beloved of [[mediocre lawyer|lawyers]] and scientists, the passive saps even the most energetic sentence of its ''joie de vivre''; along the way obscuring responsibility for action, depersonalising and sterilising whatever meat there may have been on the bones of your sentence.  
A voice beloved of [[mediocre lawyer|lawyers]] and scientists, the passive saps even the most energetic sentence of its ''joie de vivre''; along the way obscuring responsibility for action, depersonalising and sterilising whatever meat there may have been on the bones of your sentence.  


To be sure, at times where one ''should'' use the passive (if you can’t identify the author of the action, or if doing so might give offence), but generally a passive sentence is longer, flatter and duller than its [[active]] equivalent.  
To be sure, at times where one ''should'' use the passive (if you can’t identify the [[antagonist]], or if doing so might give offence), but generally a passive sentence is longer, flatter and duller than its [[active]] equivalent.  


{{plainenglish}}
{{plainenglish}}


{{c2|grammar|Plain English}}
{{c2|grammar|Plain English}}

Revision as of 18:05, 3 January 2017

A voice beloved of lawyers and scientists, the passive saps even the most energetic sentence of its joie de vivre; along the way obscuring responsibility for action, depersonalising and sterilising whatever meat there may have been on the bones of your sentence.

To be sure, at times where one should use the passive (if you can’t identify the antagonist, or if doing so might give offence), but generally a passive sentence is longer, flatter and duller than its active equivalent.

Plain English Anatomy™ Noun | Verb | Adjective | Adverb | Preposition | Conjunction | Latin | Germany | Flannel | Legal triplicate | Nominalisation | Murder your darlings