No Agency - ISDA Provision

ISDA Anatomy™ →Go uptown In a Nutshell™ Section 3(g): 3(g) No Agency. It is a principal and not an agent under this Agreement. view template 2002 ISDA full text of Section 3(g): 3(g) No Agency. It is entering into this Agreement, including each Transaction, as principal and not as agent of any person or entity. view template Click here for the text of Section 3(g) in the 1992 ISDA Index: Click ᐅ to expand: ISDA Navigation See ISDA Comparison for a comparison between the 1992 ISDA and the 2002 ISDA. The Varieties of ISDA Experience Subject 2002 (wikitext) 1992 (wikitext) 1987 (wikitext) Preamble Pre Pre Pre Interpretation 1 1 1 Obligns/Payment 2 2 2 Representations 3 3 3 Agreements 4 4 4 EODs & Term Events 5 Events of Default: FTPD • Breach • CSD • Misrep • DUST • Cross Default • Bankruptcy • MWA Termination Events: Illegality • FM • Tax Event • TEUM • CEUM • ATE 5 Events of Default: FTPD • Breach • CSD • Misrep • DUST • Cross Default • Bankruptcy • MWA Termination Events: Illegality • Tax Event • TEUM • CEUM • ATE 5 Events of Default: FTPD • Breach • CSD • Misrep • DUSS • Cross Default • Bankruptcy • MWA Termination Events: Illegality • Tax Event • TEUM • CEUM Early Termination 6 Early Termination: ET right on EOD • ET right on TE • Effect of Designation • Calculations; Payment Date • Payments on ET • Set-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EOD • ET right on TE • Effect of Designation • Calculations • Payments on ET • Set-off 6 Early Termination: ET right on EOD • ET right on TE • Effect of Designation • Calculations • Payments on ET Transfer 7 7 7 Contractual Currency 8 8 8 Miscellaneous 9 9 9 Offices; Multibranch Parties 10 10 10 Expenses 11 11 11 Notices 12 12 12 Governing Law 13 13 13 Definitions 14 14 14 Schedule Schedule Schedule Schedule Termination Provisions Part 1 Part 1 Part 1 Tax Representations Part 2 Part 2 Part 2 Documents for Delivery Part 3 Part 3 Part 3 Miscellaneous Part 4 Part 4 Part 4 Other Provisions Part 5 Part 5 Part 5 Tell me more Sign up for our newsletter — or just get in touch: for ½ a weekly 🍺 you get to consult JC. Ask about it here.

You might like our articles about principals and agents, undisclosed agents, undisclosed principals and all that good stuff. In practice, many ISDA Master Agreements are entered by agents - investment managers and asset managers - on behalf of multiple underlying principals. Asset managers often enter transactions in aggregate and only allocate them to underlying principals later in the day. This means that the broker will have a nervous few hours before it knows whom it is allowed to sue, though general principles of agency — in particular liability for an undisclosed principal —mean the agent is not quite so footloose and fancy-free as many seem to believe.

In a nutshell it is not the end of the world if your counterpart refuses to renounce all agency, as long as you set up the accounts correctly with the underlying principals, and the firm has a robust approach to trade allocation.

Internal agency model

It is not beyond the paranoid fantasies of a US tax attorney — a rich, baroque tapestry indeed — to want to “deem” a swap counterparty to be an agent for one it its affiliates for certain purposes — you know, tax purposes — even though the affiliate is not mentioned in the contract and the other side has not the first clue that this affiliate even exists.

How does this bear on your Section 3(g) representation? As far as your counterparty is concerned, not at all: a fellow acting under an agency he has not disclosed to his counterpart is called a “principal”. This is all the 3(g) representation is meant to confirm: for the avoidance of doubt — of which there wasn’t much anyway — you are not acting on behalf of someone else. Therefore, should you not perform our contract, I can bring my claim against you; you cannot slip out of the tackle by pointing to some under-capitalised espievie in a banana republic whom you suddenly claim to be representing. I can therefore instruct my credit officer that the only commercial bona fides she needs to have in mind, as she slips on her rubber gloves, are yours. It doesn’t matter whether the agency arrangement really exists: you are liable, as a principal, to me, it is your problem to recover any money you may be owed by your man in Havana.

Now whether such a representation undermines the fantastical aspirations of your tax attorney, on the other hand, is a question only he can answer.

See also

• Undisclosed principal
• Agent lender
• Agent as client