Indemnifiable Tax - ISDA Provision: Difference between revisions
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Amwelladmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Not only a [[triple negative]], but since ISDA’s definition of {{isdaprov|Tax}} already contains a negative (being any tax that isn’t a {{isdaprov|Stamp Tax}}) and “{{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}” is itself often used in the negative (e.g. “a tax which is [[not]] an {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}”) — or even ''[[double negative]]'' (e.g. “''other than'' a tax which is not an {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}”) in the body of the {{isdama}}. That makes it a '''[[sextuple negative]]'''. Beat ''that'' [[ISLA]]. | Not only a [[triple negative]], but since ISDA’s definition of {{isdaprov|Tax}} already contains a negative (being any tax that isn’t a {{isdaprov|Stamp Tax}}) and “{{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}” is itself often used in the negative (e.g. “a tax which is [[not]] an {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}”) — or even ''[[double negative]]'' (e.g. “''other than'' a tax which is not an {{isdaprov|Indemnifiable Tax}}”) in the body of the {{isdama}}. That makes it a '''[[sextuple negative]]'''. Beat ''that'' [[ISLA]]. | ||
{{ | {{sa}} | ||
*Section {{isdaprov|2(d)}} ({{isdaprov|Deduction or Withholding for Tax}}). | *Section {{isdaprov|2(d)}} ({{isdaprov|Deduction or Withholding for Tax}}). | ||
{{ref}} | {{ref}} |
Revision as of 11:19, 18 January 2020
ISDA Anatomy™
|
Withholding under the ISDA
TL;DR: The basic rationale is this:
- if the tax relates to the underlying instrument, rather than the {{{{{1}}}|Payer}}’s residence or tax status, the {{{{{1}}}|Payer}} does not have to gross up.
- if the tax relates to the {{{{{1}}}|Payer}}’s residence or tax status, then the Payer does have to gross up unless the {{{{{1}}}|Payee}} should have provided information to the {{{{{1}}}|Payer}} which would have entitled the {{{{{1}}}|Payer}} to avoid the tax.
- if you’ve agreed the {{{{{1}}}|FATCA Amendment}}, the {{{{{1}}}|Payer}} doesn’t have to gross up any {{{{{1}}}|FATCA Withholding Tax}}es.
The combination of the {{{{{1}}}|Payer Tax Representations}} and the {{{{{1}}}|Gross-Up}} clause of the ISDA Master Agreement has the following effect:
- Section {{{{{1}}}|3(e)}}: I promise you that I do not have to withhold on my payments to you (as long as all your {{{{{1}}}|Payee Tax Representations}} are correct and you have, under Section {{{{{1}}}|4(a)}}, given me everything I need to pay free of withholding);
- Section {{{{{1}}}|2(d)}}: I will not withhold on any payments to you. Unless I am required to by law. Which I kind of told you I wasn’t... If I have to withhold, I'll pay the tax the authorities and give you the receipt. If I only had to withhold because of my connection to the taxing jurisdiction (that is, if the withholding is an {{{{{1}}}|Indemnifiable Tax}}), I’ll gross you up. (You should look at the drafting of {{{{{1}}}|Indemnifiable Tax}}, by the way. It's quite a marvel). ...
- {{{{{1}}}|Gross-Up}}: Unless the tax could have been avoided if the {{{{{1}}}|Payee}} had taken made all its {{{{{1}}}|3(f)}} representations, delivered all its {{{{{1}}}|4(a)}} material, or had its {{{{{1}}}|3(f)}} representations been, like, true).
- {{{{{1}}}|Stamp Tax}} is a whole other thing.
- As is FATCA, which (as long as you’ve made your {{{{{1}}}|FATCA Amendment}} or signed up to a {{{{{1}}}|FATCA Protocol}}, provides that {{{{{1}}}|FATCA Withholding Tax}}es are excluded from the Section {{{{{1}}}|3(e)}} {{{{{1}}}|Payer Tax Representations}}, and also from the definition of {{{{{1}}}|Indemnifiable Tax}}. Meaning one doesn't have to rep, or gross up, FATCA payments.
Stamp Taxes are not Indemnifiable Taxes
Stamp Taxes are not Indemnifiable Taxes. They are covered by Section 4(e) and not the general gross-up in Section 2(d). They are not covered by Payee Tax Representations.
Negatives, negatives, everywhere
Without wishing to be overly negative[6], this one truly comes from the "wow" file in indefensible drafting:
- ... other than a tax which would not be imposed but for...
Not only a triple negative, but since ISDA’s definition of Tax already contains a negative (being any tax that isn’t a Stamp Tax) and “Indemnifiable Tax” is itself often used in the negative (e.g. “a tax which is not an Indemnifiable Tax”) — or even double negative (e.g. “other than a tax which is not an Indemnifiable Tax”) in the body of the ISDA Master Agreement. That makes it a sextuple negative. Beat that ISLA.
See also
- Section 2(d) (Deduction or Withholding for Tax).